Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Which interview did you watch? The one on CNN was closer to 30 minutes long.I don't think she had a teleprompter. That was her usual self. 18 minutes is a lot for her....and it didn't go well.
I noticed throughout Harris' interview with CNN, that she kept looking down; as she was answering the scripted questions; as if she herself was reading a script.
Where do you suppose the teleprompter was hidden from camera view?
Which interview did you watch? The one on CNN was closer to 30 minutes long.
"...To which we should apply metrics that include deadlines around time." - Kamala Harris.
I doubt very much she got any help, because that quote is a classic Kamala word salad that no scriptwriter with any self respect would write down. It could only have come from the mind of Kamala Harris.
Deadlines around time? Are there deadlines not based around time?
Can we see the 40 minutes that were edited out?So Where was the Teleprompter?
Carry on consoling yourselves, Republican supporters! This snide thread has pretty well run its course of denigrating Harris. We shall see in the inevitable polls how she was received by voters. Republicans must be worried.
Speakers often use teleprompters, though there is little to suggest that Harris did on this occasion. There is not much mileage in that 'science of the eyes' or relying on an earpiece. She did the job without dropping a catch or fumbling a pass. It was just what was needed, not spectacular but mainly giving Trump nothing.
"...To which we should apply metrics that include deadlines around time." - Kamala Harris.
I doubt very much she got any help, because that quote is a classic Kamala word salad that no scriptwriter with any self respect would write down. It could only have come from the mind of Kamala Harris.
Deadlines around time? Are there deadlines not based around time?
Well first she was against fracking, then she was for fracking; and unless she has changed her mind yet again, now she is against fracking again. Maybe this exhibition of cognitive dissonance reinforces her posture for diversity of ideas.I haven't changed my values." Forget that she hasn't really stated any values
Can we see the 40 minutes that were edited out?
Regardless, what do Harris supporters think she will do to make/ keep America Great? I have yet to see an answer to this question.
About 10 minutes of it were directed at Walz.Which interview did you watch? The one on CNN was closer to 30 minutes long.
Is word salad going to be the new misused talking point? It might be an unnecessary addition but it is perfectly cogent and understandable."...To which we should apply metrics that include deadlines around time." - Kamala Harris.
I doubt very much she got any help, because that quote is a classic Kamala word salad that no scriptwriter with any self respect would write down. It could only have come from the mind of Kamala Harris.
Deadlines around time? Are there deadlines not based around time?
It certainly seems that way. Though, I'm not sure how many of the folks misusing that term don't know what it means or can't actually parse the sentences, so, to them, it does seem to be gobbledygook.Is word salad going to be the new misused talking point? It might be an unnecessary addition but it is perfectly cogent and understandable.
About 10 minutes of it were directed at Walz.
It certainly seems that way. Though, I'm not sure how many of the folks misusing that term don't know what it means or can't actually parse the sentences, so, to them, it does seem to be gobbledygook.
Mic drop.Exactly. First question...
1. What will you do day 1? Simple question, every candidate gets asked it. She spends a minute rambling on about nothing and then Dana has to remind her to answer the question.
That rambling nonsense is classic Harris. The back half...the part where she describes an economic plan is not only a vague set of policies....but to the credit of Dana....it leads to her 1st hard question...
2. Why haven't you already moved forward on these economic issues?
Then Harris goes on to say that first...they had to save the economy.
That's right.. her top priority is to save the economy. Why didn't she do these things under Biden? Because first they had to save the economy.
It's classic Harris.
She never said in 2020 she was for fracking. She said Joe Biden was.Well first she was against fracking, then she was for fracking; and unless she has changed her mind yet again, now she is against fracking again. Maybe this exhibition of cognitive dissonance reinforces her posture for diversity of ideas.
Yep, we are too uneducated to understand her super-nuanced sentences.It certainly seems that way. Though, I'm not sure how many of the folks misusing that term don't know what it means or can't actually parse the sentences, so, to them, it does seem to be gobbledygook.
The more accurate way to characterize her statements is to say....
They often lack substance and ramble.
I think it's a big problem when they mislabel things intentionally to deceive. One example would be taking Trump's answer regarding a question about Harris's race and pretending it shows his (or the right's) obsession with race is deliberately deceitful.
I’m just calling it as I see it. When you guys point fingers as something completely sensible, it just makes you all look bad.Yep, we are too uneducated to understand her super-nuanced sentences.
It is a bit pointless to describe anybody's spoken language as word salad. Spoken language is hardly ever in sentences in the strict grammatical sense, and that is all right because the meaning is usually clear in context. So it is no surprise that Trump and Harris speeches cannot always be parsed.I agree.
Perhaps, though I’d have to know the specific case.
I’m just calling it as I see it. When you guys point fingers as something completely sensible, it just makes you all look bad.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?