Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
So is Barr the Attorney General or Trumps personal lawyer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="whatbogsends" data-source="post: 73936179" data-attributes="member: 11978"><p>Barr received a letter from the head of the Mueller's team (Mueller) which expresses concerns about his summary letter. When asked if you "<em>Reports have emerged recently … that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings. <strong>Do you know what they’re referencing with that?</strong></em>" about potential concerns by the team you answer "<em><strong>No, I don’t. I think, I think, I suspect that they probably wanted, you know, more put out</strong>. But in my view, I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize, because I think any summary regardless of who prepares it not only runs the risk of, you know, being under-inclusive or over-inclusive but also, you know, would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once.</em>". I think<strong> the obvious, honest answer would be "i'm not sure if this is what you're referring to, but I did receive a letter from Mueller indicating... </strong>"and cite what Mueller had communicated. Indicating that he has no idea as to what they're referencing is either dishonest or idiotic. </p><p></p><p>You can defend it all you want, but his answer certainly is not "<strong>the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth</strong>".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="whatbogsends, post: 73936179, member: 11978"] Barr received a letter from the head of the Mueller's team (Mueller) which expresses concerns about his summary letter. When asked if you "[I]Reports have emerged recently … that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings. [B]Do you know what they’re referencing with that?[/B][/I]" about potential concerns by the team you answer "[I][B]No, I don’t. I think, I think, I suspect that they probably wanted, you know, more put out[/B]. But in my view, I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize, because I think any summary regardless of who prepares it not only runs the risk of, you know, being under-inclusive or over-inclusive but also, you know, would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once.[/I]". I think[B] the obvious, honest answer would be "i'm not sure if this is what you're referring to, but I did receive a letter from Mueller indicating... [/B]"and cite what Mueller had communicated. Indicating that he has no idea as to what they're referencing is either dishonest or idiotic. You can defend it all you want, but his answer certainly is not "[B]the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth[/B]". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
So is Barr the Attorney General or Trumps personal lawyer?
Top
Bottom