Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
So is Barr the Attorney General or Trumps personal lawyer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="whatbogsends" data-source="post: 73927237" data-attributes="member: 11978"><p>Trump's attempted removal of Mueller via McGahn (Section E, Volume 2), and subsequently attempting to have McGahn deny that action (Section I, Volume 2) and his attempts to Curtail the investigation (Section F, Volume 2). Additionally, his witness tampering with Cohen and Manafort (Sections J & K, Volume 2). </p><p></p><p>I'd go into more detail, but you may be aware that a slew of previous federal prosecutors have already detailed themselves. <a href="https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1" target="_blank">STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS</a></p><p></p><p>You, yourself linked a summary (from Richard Hoeg) which you felt was accurate, which described the actions pertaining to those efforts as evidence of obstruction. Yet, you somehow believe, that because some of the other potentially obstructive acts were less clear cut, that it mitigates the aforementioned actions - it doesn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="whatbogsends, post: 73927237, member: 11978"] Trump's attempted removal of Mueller via McGahn (Section E, Volume 2), and subsequently attempting to have McGahn deny that action (Section I, Volume 2) and his attempts to Curtail the investigation (Section F, Volume 2). Additionally, his witness tampering with Cohen and Manafort (Sections J & K, Volume 2). I'd go into more detail, but you may be aware that a slew of previous federal prosecutors have already detailed themselves. [URL="https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1"]STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS[/URL] You, yourself linked a summary (from Richard Hoeg) which you felt was accurate, which described the actions pertaining to those efforts as evidence of obstruction. Yet, you somehow believe, that because some of the other potentially obstructive acts were less clear cut, that it mitigates the aforementioned actions - it doesn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
So is Barr the Attorney General or Trumps personal lawyer?
Top
Bottom