I missed the big uprising (thank the Lord) but I wanted to be sure I could still post here. I consider myself a moderate, but the forum over there is a little to heated/controversal for me. I am an agree to disagree type of girl on theology. I will not answer questions that I can not give a traditional view on. So if I play nice, can I stay? To place moderates over there with former Adventist is kind of a stretch, at least for me!
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So I can still post here?
- Thread starter catmommy
- Start date
T
TrustAndObey
Guest
I'm sorry I (or anyone else for that matter) didn't answer this sooner. I just now saw it.
OF COURSE you can stay. It was their decision to place "Moderates" in the title but if you are having difficulty with the conversations there, by all means join us here!!
Welcome, welcome, welcome!
Upvote
0
To be considered a member of this forum, and be able to teach and debate (which is the privilege that membership gives you), you must agree with the Statement of Faith of the forum. This is outlined in the Forum-specific Guidelines (FSGs) for the forum.
If you don't agree with the Statement of Faith, you can still post here, but you are limited to fellowship posts. These are defined in the Congregation-wide Guidelines.
(basically, if you play nice and don't argue, you should be fine. *grins*)
If you don't agree with the Statement of Faith, you can still post here, but you are limited to fellowship posts. These are defined in the Congregation-wide Guidelines.
(basically, if you play nice and don't argue, you should be fine. *grins*)
Upvote
0
Here is the definition of a Fellowship post in the forum..
1) It is not debate or apologetics (defense).
Those who disagree with a congregations Statement of Faith will not discuss reasons for or against any subject being discussed on this sub-forum. This includes questions that essentially are rebuttal or argumentative in nature. Those who disagree will not engage in theological discussions that defend their particular point of view on scriptural, theological, doctrinal, social, or political issues.
2) It is not answering questions or teaching.
Only a member of the congregational forum may give answers to and instruct on doctrinal questions. While there may be many very good ideas on the subject from non-members, they may not give instruction. Earnest questions are always welcome, from anyone.
3) What Fellowship is:
Essentially fellowship is defined as the discussion of topics of association, of companionship - i.e. discussions of things like friends, family, work..... these topics are fellowship. Posts that offer friendship would certainly be described as fellowship
DEFINITION OF A FELLOWSHIP POST
1) It is not debate or apologetics (defense).
Those who disagree with a congregations Statement of Faith will not discuss reasons for or against any subject being discussed on this sub-forum. This includes questions that essentially are rebuttal or argumentative in nature. Those who disagree will not engage in theological discussions that defend their particular point of view on scriptural, theological, doctrinal, social, or political issues.
2) It is not answering questions or teaching.
Only a member of the congregational forum may give answers to and instruct on doctrinal questions. While there may be many very good ideas on the subject from non-members, they may not give instruction. Earnest questions are always welcome, from anyone.
3) What Fellowship is:
Essentially fellowship is defined as the discussion of topics of association, of companionship - i.e. discussions of things like friends, family, work..... these topics are fellowship. Posts that offer friendship would certainly be described as fellowship
Upvote
0
So I can post questions, but not answer other's questions. Could you guys consider taking moderates back as full members over here? They really don't belong in the Progressive/Former Adventist forum. Moderates don't reject the beliefs, they may just interpret them a little differently. Over there, they outright don't agree. So basically, we are without a home. I really don't want to be torn to shreads over there, however I can respond, I can ask questions over here, but I can't respond. I may need to find another online community. Thanks.
Upvote
0
O
OntheDL
Guest
Hi,
I'll highlight the part I think that can apply to you.
The Debate/Discussion subforum is mainly a debate forum. The guideline for who can post here allows for debates and discussions among members and non-members who are studying Adventist beliefs with the inclination to join the church or have shown they are friends of the church and respective of our Adventist beliefs.
I think you can post questions and comments as long as you do it respectfully. I don't think that should be a problem.
I'll highlight the part I think that can apply to you.
The Debate/Discussion subforum is mainly a debate forum. The guideline for who can post here allows for debates and discussions among members and non-members who are studying Adventist beliefs with the inclination to join the church or have shown they are friends of the church and respective of our Adventist beliefs.
I think you can post questions and comments as long as you do it respectfully. I don't think that should be a problem.
Upvote
0
I think that understanding is correct and best explains the intent and purpose of those words in the FSG.
Upvote
0
'Moderates' are by definition not extreme and I would say respectful of Adventist beliefs so I dont see a issue. I have always seen myself as a moderate as I 'believe but question' in order that my faith grows and strenghthens as the spirit unveils truth and understading.
Main Entry: 1mod·er·ate
Pronunciation: \ˈmä-d(ə-)rət\ Function: adjective Etymology: Middle English, from Latin moderatus, from past participle of moderare to moderate; akin to Latin modus measure Date: 15th century 1 a: avoiding extremes of behavior or expression : observing reasonable limits <a moderate drinker> b: calm, temperate2 a: tending toward the mean or average amount or dimension b: having average or less than average quality : mediocre
3: professing or characterized by political or social beliefs that are not extreme
4: limited in scope or effect
5: not expensive : reasonable or low in price6of a color : of medium lightness and medium chroma
mod·er·ate·ly adverb
mod·er·ate·ness noun
Upvote
0
T
TrustAndObey
Guest
Catmommy, I think you may be under the wrong assumption about something. We never asked the moderates to leave so there really is no need for us to take them "back". This split was the Progressives' brainchild along with their moderator.
We didn't ask them to leave, we had no part in naming their forum, etc.
I think there was a discussion amongst themselves about naming the forum Progessive/Evangelical/Former, but someone took offense to "evangelical" and they chose moderate instead.
I guess in some ways I'd be considered moderate myself, so no, we never asked them to leave. I just wanted you to know that!
I can PM you the link that started this whole thing off if you'd like?
Upvote
0
mva1985
Senior Veteran
- Jun 18, 2007
- 3,448
- 223
- 58
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
Trust,
I think you got it right.
For the most part I am considered traditional but in some areas people would probably label me a moderate.
Catmommy, I say "come on in the water is fine!!!!"
(if anyone can tell me what movie that line is from I will bless you with 200 blessings)
I think you got it right.
For the most part I am considered traditional but in some areas people would probably label me a moderate.
Catmommy, I say "come on in the water is fine!!!!"
(if anyone can tell me what movie that line is from I will bless you with 200 blessings)
Upvote
0
Hi CatMommy,
Please know that you are welcome to join us. You have already stated the difference between this forum and the new one. It is that kind of behavior, more than any name, that caused the split. Your behavior here has always been exemplary and you will always be welcome. You are indeed a SDA by any standard that may be used and as such are entitled to membership here.
If I may be of service in any way please feel free to call on me at anytime.
Your friend and brother in Christ,
Doc
Please know that you are welcome to join us. You have already stated the difference between this forum and the new one. It is that kind of behavior, more than any name, that caused the split. Your behavior here has always been exemplary and you will always be welcome. You are indeed a SDA by any standard that may be used and as such are entitled to membership here.
If I may be of service in any way please feel free to call on me at anytime.
Your friend and brother in Christ,
Doc
Upvote
0
I loved the music.
T
TrustAndObey
Guest
But to get technical...I believe the line was, "come on in, boys, the water's fine!"
Upvote
0
T
TrustAndObey
Guest
I'm a great big nerd MVA...the sooner you realize that, the better off we'll all be!
Upvote
0
T
TrustAndObey
Guest
(I don't want to study anymore for my test tomorrow, but if I don't, and I don't do well...I'll never forgive myself. I'm just mentally exhausted and some of this stuff either you know or you don't. Ughhhh)
Upvote
0
Similar threads
