Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Situational Fetus Murder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nathan45" data-source="post: 43936467"><p>To see it for logical reasons you'd have to know what the purpose of the law was, which is social order, not the law of non-contradiction. To see a contradiction here is to miss the point. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>It's like this: Someone who violently attacks a pregnant woman and kills her baby deserves to be locked up for a LONG time. They need to be charged with something. Would you want someone like that running loose? Trying to derive the law logically would be missing the point. </p><p> </p><p>There is no contradiction, because it is easy to distinguish between abortion and murdering a fetus: In one case the woman wishes to have a baby, in the other case she doesn't -- under current law the woman is under no obligation to continue to be a baby factory if she doesn't want to be. As for why one is murder and one isn't--murder is to "kill illegally". So what constitutes murder is defined by statute.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nathan45, post: 43936467"] To see it for logical reasons you'd have to know what the purpose of the law was, which is social order, not the law of non-contradiction. To see a contradiction here is to miss the point. It's like this: Someone who violently attacks a pregnant woman and kills her baby deserves to be locked up for a LONG time. They need to be charged with something. Would you want someone like that running loose? Trying to derive the law logically would be missing the point. There is no contradiction, because it is easy to distinguish between abortion and murdering a fetus: In one case the woman wishes to have a baby, in the other case she doesn't -- under current law the woman is under no obligation to continue to be a baby factory if she doesn't want to be. As for why one is murder and one isn't--murder is to "kill illegally". So what constitutes murder is defined by statute. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Situational Fetus Murder
Top
Bottom