• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Simulated child porn

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hermit

Loser
Aug 17, 2004
831
25
✟1,122.00
Faith
Atheist
Why should or why shouldn't simulated child porn be illegal? By "simulated child porn" I mean child porn not involving or hurting any actual children. Produced for instance by animation, or actors made to look younger than 18. In my understanding such pornography is legal in the USA, but illegal for instance in Germany.

What's your stance on this issue?
 

Lynden1000

Senior Veteran
Nov 6, 2005
2,454
196
54
Orlando, Florida
✟3,628.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Why should or why shouldn't simulated child porn be illegal? By "simulated child porn" I mean child porn not involving or hurting any actual children. Produced for instance by animation, or actors made to look younger than 18. In my understanding such pornography is legal in the USA, but illegal for instance in Germany.

What's your stance on this issue?

I think, but am not certain, that simulated child porn (as in the varieties that you described above) is also illegal in the US.

For example, in the phone sex industry, an adult worker can talk like a child and act like a child, and give every indication that she's a child, but if the caller asks her how old she is, she cannot give an age under 18 or she's just broken the law by simulating kiddie porn.

As to whether it should be illegal, I don't know. We can simulate every other crime legally. Rape, murder, assault, even torture- those are all illegal but they are dramatized on screen every day. Even the great movie classics would be contraband if we outlawed the simulation of every illegal activity.
 
Upvote 0

Robbie_James_Francis

May all beings have happiness and its causes
Apr 12, 2005
9,317
661
36
England, UK
✟35,261.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
That's quite a difficult question. I'm assuming that you're talking about pornography where it is explicitly stated that those involved are all over 18 (and they are), but the images or whatever imitate child porn. Obviously, if there are claims that the actors are under 18, it would probably be illegal as well.

On the one hand, as has been pointed out, no children are actually harmed in the process of making the porn. And perhaps, as disgusting as it is, it could reduce the demand for actual child pornography.

On the other hand, it is encouraging something that is appalling harmful to innocent children, and is a huge problem in our world. I'm not saying that it could make someone become sexually attracted to children, but that it could increase the desire of paedophiles to view actual child pornography or to start or continue to abuse children themselves.

Because it is pornography specifically, it's different from other media in that films involving murder, rape or whatever are not made solely for sexual enjoyment. Pornography is, so simulated child porn is actually encouraging child abuse though films etc. can include something without encouraging it in sucha way.

Other types of porn (with the exception of that involving animals if it exists :sick: ), no matter how repulsive some people may find them, even if animated, could all be performed in reality with consent. Simulated child porn could not, because children cannot consent to sexual activity.

So I guess I'd have to say it should probably be illegal.
 
Upvote 0
marblehead said: "Legal. It doesn't hurt anyone"

Ha! Don't you think a temptation might be there to rape chidren if men are looking at porn with images of children??!!?? Besides, porn in any case destroys lives and families.
Thoughtcrime.
 
Upvote 0
That doesn't make any sense.
Yes it does. Someone thinking something and the possibility that they could commit a crime is not a crime, it's thoughtcrime.

Everyone has the potential for crime. That doesn't mean we should ban something because someone who enjoys it might commit a crime.
 
Upvote 0

Beanieboy

Senior Veteran
Jan 20, 2006
6,297
1,214
62
✟65,132.00
Faith
Christian
We act like this is something new, but heterosexual men seemed obsessed by the "Babydoll" dress, girls talking like babies, putting makeup on their eyes and shaving their legs (and sometimes more) to look prepubescent, having girls wear pigtails, dressing up in Catholic highschool uniforms or cheerleading uniforms...

It's nothing new.
 
Upvote 0

JESUSFREAK1354

Hobbit loving Tolkienite
May 9, 2007
199
9
33
Louisiana
✟22,878.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
No, I'M NOOOOOTTTT!!! QUIT SAYING THAT, EVERYBODY! I HAVE EXPERINCED THESE THINGS FIRSTHAND, WITH FAMILY MEMBERS. I'M NOT A MINDLESS CHILD WHO ONLY THINKS ABOUT FUN AND"MOMMY I WANT CANDY!" I HAVE A VERY VAST THINKING CAPACITY.
 
Upvote 0
C

cobaltburrito

Guest
No, I'M NOOOOOTTTT!!! QUIT SAYING THAT, EVERYBODY! I HAVE EXPERINCED THESE THINGS FIRSTHAND, WITH FAMILY MEMBERS. I'M NOT A MINDLESS CHILD WHO ONLY THINKS ABOUT FUN AND"MOMMY I WANT CANDY!" I HAVE A VERY VAST THINKING CAPACITY.
Dude. Chill out.

To answer the question: No, simulated child pornography shouldn't be illegal. It doesn't harm anyone, with the possible exception of the consumer of the porn.
 
Upvote 0
X

xXThePrimeDirectiveXx

Guest
No, I'M NOOOOOTTTT!!! QUIT SAYING THAT, EVERYBODY! I HAVE EXPERINCED THESE THINGS FIRSTHAND, WITH FAMILY MEMBERS. I'M NOT A MINDLESS CHILD WHO ONLY THINKS ABOUT FUN AND"MOMMY I WANT CANDY!" I HAVE A VERY VAST THINKING CAPACITY.
LOL I'm beginning to think this is someone's alt posting account, putting on a show.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.