• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Shoulds gays allowed to be in the Boy Scouts?

Status
Not open for further replies.

morningstar2651

Senior Veteran
Dec 6, 2004
14,557
2,591
40
Arizona
✟74,149.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
And as for Boy Scouting being a Christian organization -- that's not true.


Boy Scouts is about scouting, not about religion.

 
Upvote 0

Scally Cap

GO IRISH!!!
Jun 23, 2004
856
109
58
Baja Arizona
Visit site
✟24,055.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
morningstar2651 said:
And as for Boy Scouting being a Christian organization -- that's not true.

This needs to be repeated several times. The leadership has been taken over by evangelicals and the LDS, so it may seem like an officially conservative Christian club, but it's explicitly non-sectarian. Theistic, yes, but not officially aligned with any specific denomination.
 
Upvote 0

Ampoliros

I'm my own wireless hotspot
May 15, 2004
1,459
111
39
Mars - IN MY MIND!
✟17,185.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Boy Scouts aren't a specifically Christian organization. They are a religious organization at the very least - and they are predominantly Christian, which causes favorable treatment of Christianity over all others (at the very least).
 
Upvote 0

Scally Cap

GO IRISH!!!
Jun 23, 2004
856
109
58
Baja Arizona
Visit site
✟24,055.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ampoliros said:
Boy Scouts aren't a specifically Christian organization. They are a religious organization at the very least - and they are predominantly Christian, which causes favorable treatment of Christianity over all others (at the very least).

And that's the unfortunate thing. I have absolutely nothing to back this up with other than personal experience and my gut feeling, but I suspect a significant number of people who otherwise would love to get involved with Scouting are put off by the religious emphasis. I was Cubmaster at my son's school for a couple of years, in a fairly progressive neighborhood in a mostly progressive town. Maybe two of the kids in the pack were traditionally religious. We were all in it for the outdoors and character-building aspects of the program. Then when the Dale case hit the news and our council took a strident anti-gay position based on Biblical principles (including sending copies of an editorial to every registered family titled "Protect Scouting From Assault By Homosexuals"), that was the end of the pack. Up to that point, it was okay to leave the "duty to God" up to the families' discretion, however they chose to explore spirituality--but it became painfully clear that, at least in this council, the definition of "duty to God" was to be set by the influential LDS presence. There was so much frustration for parents who genuinely wanted their boys involved in what we had quickly built into a good program, but who couldn't conscientously support an organization that excluded members based on who they love (those parents' words, unprompted by me). Some of looked into switching over to Campfire, but by that point we were too emotionally exhausted to do it.
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Scouting is what it because of it "Christian" background. I know of no perfect organazation in this world; however, the Scouts should stay just as they are. It isn't suppose to be picnic for liberals. Let them form their own club.
 
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,645
10,392
the Great Basin
✟403,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
LittleNipper said:
Scouting is what it because of it "Christian" background. I know of no perfect organazation in this world; however, the Scouts should stay just as they are. It isn't suppose to be picnic for liberals. Let them form their own club.

Why should liberals form their own club? Don't you mean that the non-religious or non-Christians should form their own club?
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
SimplyMe said:
Why should liberals form their own club? Don't you mean that the non-religious or non-Christians should form their own club?

Let's just say, that those who do not like the scouts for whatever reason should form their own club and leave everyone else alone.
 
Reactions: BarbB
Upvote 0

outlaw

the frugal revolutionary
Aug 22, 2005
2,814
268
49
✟4,376.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
LittleNipper said:
Scouting is what it because of it "Christian" background. I know of no perfect organazation in this world; however, the Scouts should stay just as they are. It isn't suppose to be picnic for liberals. Let them form their own club.
The same can be said of the KKK. They are what they are because of their Christian background and the KKK isn’t supposed to be a picnic for liberals.





http://www.geocities.com/__izzy__/Dengue/kkk/history.htm

http://www.pointsouth.com/csanet/kkk.htm

http://users.skynet.be/terrorism/html/usa_kkk.htm

 
Upvote 0

""

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2005
20,632
1,131
✟27,472.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Scally Cap said:
ebia and others have very patiently pointed out that the APA's definition of "homosexual orientation" is not dependent on which OED usage you want to select for the single word "orientation."
Yes, and wasn't that lovely of them?
The problem is that I didn't ask what the APA thinks of Homosexual Orientation, nor did I bring that topic up. I spoke of ORIENTATION, which suggests a "learned behavior" and what the DSM thinks about learned behaviors. Therefore, all of those patiently pointed out definitions were non-applicable.

If all you have to fall back on is splitting hairs about linguistics, rather than the substance of the APA's position on homosexuality, that's pretty weak.

Once again, you and your co-horts are off on the topic of homosexual orientation, and I am still on the topic of ORIENTATION, which is what I was discussing. Now it's very kind of you to go over (again and again) the APA's position on homosexuality, but let us point our focus toward my addition to this topic. ORIENTATION!

Are you capable of separating homosexuality from orientation or not? That has been my suggestion all along, yet none of you seem willing to do so. Ebia and Outlaw defended their beliefs that homosexuality is an orientation, by giving a definition that basically sums up my position: Orientation is a learned behavior which, according to the DSM, can be changed. I'm not the one that keeps attaching homosexuality to orientation, all of you are. Yet you're all getting after me for your own mistake. Why is that?

Well... FINALLY. Somebody is making sense here. If you want to apply an "innate" quality to homosexuality, then yes, you should stop using the term orientation. There now. Was that so difficult?


By the way, Adiya, since you took every opportunity to demonstrate that your grasp of English is superior to ebia's, I assume you used "ponder" incorrectly in the quoted sentence above for humorous effect.

Are you a fan of literature my friend?

Ponder
pon·dered, pon·der·ing, pon·ders
1. To weigh in the mind with thoroughness and care.
2. To reflect or consider with thoroughness and care.

My use of it was correct, but the syntax I must credit to Mark Twain. He wasn't the most brilliant linguist (according to modern writers) but to me, he was amazing. He pondered at, about, on, over, and around, the subject, using the verb in a most ingenious manner. I love his writings. I'm a fool for literature, what can I say. I like to quote author's in my comments. Many posters don't grasp that, but those who are avid readers generally will, and they send me a note telling me that they got it. No big deal.

Have a lovely day.
 
Upvote 0

""

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2005
20,632
1,131
✟27,472.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Dislike said:
Y'know, Adiya, I can't tell you exactly why, or exactly how, but I find you to be the most annoying person I've ever had the misfortune of meeting!
Fantastic.
Now if we had only met, your impression would be applicable.

Have a lovely day.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.