Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Should we take a page from Dawkins regarding 9/11 Truth?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trunks2k" data-source="post: 43050183" data-attributes="member: 24431"><p>Because, to be fair, Clinton was impeached for lying under oath not having an affair. Although the media and politicians on both sides of the aisle sure did a good job of making the whole situation about the affair rather than the lying under oath. Though i do not believe Clinton's lie under oath was a big enough thing for impeachment and it became a total partisan witch hunt. Censure him? Sure.</p><p></p><p>Also, incompetence is not really an impeachable offense. If you could prove that Bush knowingly lied about something, then you might have an impeachable offense (depending). But you'll have a hard time proving that, and this is coming from a person who believes the Bush admin did knowingly lie about stuff in the lead up to the Iraq war.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trunks2k, post: 43050183, member: 24431"] Because, to be fair, Clinton was impeached for lying under oath not having an affair. Although the media and politicians on both sides of the aisle sure did a good job of making the whole situation about the affair rather than the lying under oath. Though i do not believe Clinton's lie under oath was a big enough thing for impeachment and it became a total partisan witch hunt. Censure him? Sure. Also, incompetence is not really an impeachable offense. If you could prove that Bush knowingly lied about something, then you might have an impeachable offense (depending). But you'll have a hard time proving that, and this is coming from a person who believes the Bush admin did knowingly lie about stuff in the lead up to the Iraq war. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Should we take a page from Dawkins regarding 9/11 Truth?
Top
Bottom