Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Should we take a page from Dawkins regarding 9/11 Truth?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Btodd" data-source="post: 43035051" data-attributes="member: 14939"><p>I think at some point, integrity hinges upon their willingness to put forth a plausible scenario that explains what happened that day, and then proceed to support it with positive evidence. But it becomes obvious at some point that there's a reason this game hasn't changed in 6 years, and won't for the next however many......there's nothing being done but simply an appeal to public opinion and labeling things like surfing conspiracy sites as 'research'. There is no other theory yet, and appears to be no attempt or sense of responsibility to work toward one. That's why I like the term '9/11 Doubt Movement' as opposed to 'Truth'.......so far, they haven't left the doubt phase toward any other goal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with both points......it is fascinating, and should make all of us look for our blind spots and patterns of thinking that we're reluctant to face objectively. I'm sure we all fail somewhere.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Btodd</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Btodd, post: 43035051, member: 14939"] I think at some point, integrity hinges upon their willingness to put forth a plausible scenario that explains what happened that day, and then proceed to support it with positive evidence. But it becomes obvious at some point that there's a reason this game hasn't changed in 6 years, and won't for the next however many......there's nothing being done but simply an appeal to public opinion and labeling things like surfing conspiracy sites as 'research'. There is no other theory yet, and appears to be no attempt or sense of responsibility to work toward one. That's why I like the term '9/11 Doubt Movement' as opposed to 'Truth'.......so far, they haven't left the doubt phase toward any other goal. I agree with both points......it is fascinating, and should make all of us look for our blind spots and patterns of thinking that we're reluctant to face objectively. I'm sure we all fail somewhere. Btodd [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Should we take a page from Dawkins regarding 9/11 Truth?
Top
Bottom