G
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Maybe not. People seem to really want porn based upon statistics. And bandwidth is important for all those video downloads.Ampmonster said:$10billion a year in porn a bigger waste.
haha isn't that what we ALL do?besides, I need you all here to eventually make you agree with MY way of thinking
the fact that people want it doesnt mean it's not a waste. porn serves not one constuctive purpose.G_Spot_Tornado said:Maybe not. People seem to really want porn based upon statistics. And bandwidth is important for all those video downloads.
I don't agree with that, it is conservative just as all the rest of the news is liberal biased, this way you can get both sides of the same story, and land somewhere in between.G_Spot_Tornado said:Spot the man with no sense of humour. The OP was somewhat (though not entirely) in jest.
No wonder we Christians are the butt of so many comments about lacking humour!
On a more serious note though, I think even most arch-conservatives and fundamentalists might agree that worldnetdaily is a waste of important internet bandwidth.
Yes. In the past, I have been able to cross-reference and verify some of the stories and quoted statements (using sources both foreign and domestic), which have been reported by WND and other internet news magazines as well. WND sometimes also runs exclusive interviews which can be easily verified, if you have the inclination.G_Spot_Tornado said:. . . Has anyone ever seen a factual piece of reporting from them?
Would you give us an example?G_Spot_Tornado said:I was using hyperbole somewhat but the difference between the mainstream media and worldnetdaily (which I sometimes suspect of being a parody a la LandoverBaptist) is that many reports on worldnet crop up as urban legends several weeks later.
i.e. they are made up reports
ROTFLMAO!Paula said:Would you give us an example?
G_Spot_Tornado said:ROTFLMAO!
You are really serious thinking worldnetdaily is a legitimate news source.
Why not in your Google search box enter "worldnetdaily" and "urban legends".
Look at all the hits you get, especially from snopes.com where they list the worldnetdaily examples of "stories" they ran with and it turned out to be fake material or they picked up "stories" that were planted as fake because smart folks know what a bunch of illiterate fools run worldnetdaily.
Lifting the Onion parody about Harry Potter and treating it as new. LOL LOL - What a bunch of blinded by their zealotry morons - have they ever heard of fact checking.
There are many other examples if you troll the search hits.
Good hunting and sorry for the bubble burst.
We can also add the Washington Post a few years back..remember??jameseb said:I'll give ya ***-for-tat....
New York Times. Liberal news source. Known for fabricating stories too.
How do ya like them apples?
*bows*
Thank you, thank you.... autopgraphs will be signed later.
crystalpc said:We can also add the Washington Post a few years back..remember??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?