Ive presented the scientific evidence many many times in this Forum and on other Forums. I can very well do it all again, but, this time around....im going to handle things a little differently because you were wayyyy too fast at saying 'Ok ' youd be willing to surrender your life to your Creator who is also the Creator of the Universe (which we both know you would never do...otherwise youd be calling yourself something other than 'an atheist' ) . So continuing....let us examine HOW willing you truly would be ,shall we ??
So first you wouldn't back up your claim because you didn't think self would be open to changing his mind, and now that's he said he would be you think that's a problem too.
Again - stop farting about, and just get on with it. Post your evidence.
And yet again, atheist does not mean what you insist it does - it does not mean that any theistic claim is instantly dismissed.
Given your track record of failing to back up your claims adequately and of misrepresenting atheists, you really don't get to demand conditions before supporting a claim. You're the one on thin ice here. Now enough games, and back up your points.
1. Tell us how diligent youve been in the past to seek out the scientific evidence for an intelligent Designer; tell us about your exhaustive personal research and list the Sources you went to ? Tell us how you have used the simple google-search feature on your computer in your serious investigation ? Tell us about how open-minded you are to approach this topic in an unbiased way and not come to the table with your mind already made up (being an atheist) ?
Google search = serious investigation?
Aw, bless, and you think you can lecture us about serious investigation?
2. YOU tell us how natural causes (the atheists worldview/origins) can explain the origin of the universe, the origin of our firmly-established Physics Constants and Mathematical Constants all working together ,flawlessly and in unison, and then being sustained day after day after day ...as one example ?
Utterly irrelevant. We're talking about your claim, not those of the opposing side. Even if they were false, that has no bearing on your claim.
This is, yet again, another attempt at an evasion from you, who has a proven track record of being way out of their depth in discussions.
3. YOU tell us about any personal ulterior motives you may have for NEEDING to maintain your atheism ... such as but not limited to, your sexual mores and maintenance of other lifestyle choices ?
Right. Self couldn't possibly be approaching this topic honestly because of his orientation?
More bigotry from you will only make the ice you're on thinner, champ.
Lets get these things out of the way first, so you can properly / accurately / and unbiasedly consider the scientific evidences we have for an obvious intelligent Designer. Thank you in advance for your honesty, forthrightness at divulging information concerning your personal life, and your genuineness for really wanting to know the scientific evidences for our Creator (as if you dont know them and cant discover what they are, already).
It's so funny how someone as dishonest and evasive as you will sign off with such sanctimonious drivel as this. If you were actually concerned about honesty, you would have responded to calls to back up your unsupported assertion about three posts back. Instead you have engaged in nothing but red herrings and smearing your opposition.
Self does not have to address any personal red herrings in order to justify your shouldering of the burden of proof. You already shouldered it when you made the claim that you did.
Now back up your claim, sharpish.