Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
bingoIf someone who is fertile but unfit or unable to care for a baby has a baby, why is it, why should it, be anyone elses responsibility? When the womb donor wasn't responsible should they just be allowed to keep making problems for society to take on? Or should she be held accountable? And for the sake of the children?
No, I am saying given a choice between someone who is NOT married, but is willing to step up and care for the child or someone who is married, but does NOT want to step up and care for the child or children and instead expects the government to do so while they keep having children.Obviously I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about your attitude, which is that rich people can have as many illegitimate children as they like.
I have a friend that when we meet up, we always end up talking about a fairly controversial issue and often can never agree on them.
This came up yesterday as we were watching a programme on a family on welfare benefits with 11 children who were saying that the government were not helping them enough to look after the children and buy what they need.
What are your views? Should the government/ general public be in the position to pay for this?
Why should the government pay for people's choice to have children for whom they cannot provide?No one here is in a position to be judgemental especially in regards to the children. The children should not be grouped with the patents situation. In fact the children may aspire to become better than their parents in many ways and contribute to the society in a positive way.
So in regards to whether the government should pay for parents to have children. Well definitely yes because parents are providing the next generation of workforce and tax prayers that the government will benefit from and any money that the government has invested in them in their early life will more than be paid for in taxes alone and in being consumers to help the economies growth in the future.
Money spent by government now from tax payers is recycled back to the system eventually worth 10000 percentage interest on top.
Why should the government pay for people's choice to have children for whom they cannot provide?
Women wanted 'liberation' and then had to turn back around and demand aid from men to continue such. Birth control didn't do anything except make women gravely irresponsible of the fact that they are women and rue being born with a uterus.
I do sort of enjoy the idea of something backfiring on women, being that men are so attacked and indoctrinated into a false concept that women essentially be as much like men as they can while men be as so as women. I don't like the idea of men being told there is something intrinsically wrong with them and not women when it is clearly the opposite if one wants to go there.
I'll bite.
What's intrinsically wrong with women?
Nothing, but they should be held accountable for their actions the same as men.I'll bite.
What's intrinsically wrong with women?
The way you talk, it's as if the womb is not your problem.
The accountability part of their brain is apparently non-existent.
I mean seriously can you name one thing? Just one. Because I see feminism as a volley of lies and blaming, and whenever any of those things are proven wrong they don't even have it in them to admit it, they just go on to another deceit.
When a woman states that she is not one of them she is seen as a dissenter.
That's pretty damning as far as I'm concerned.
Birth control and abortion simply means that they can't even take accountability for their own natural bodies. It's women trying essentially to be like men, seeing their uterus and womb as a disadvantage. It's not hard to see the incredibly absurd problem there.
The accountability part of their brain is apparently non-existent.
I mean seriously can you name one thing? Just one. Because I see feminism as a volley of lies and blaming, and whenever any of those things are proven wrong they don't even have it in them to admit it, they just go on to another deceit.
When a woman states that she is not one of them she is seen as a dissenter.
That's pretty damning as far as I'm concerned.
Birth control and abortion simply means that they can't even take accountability for their own natural bodies. It's women trying essentially to be like men, seeing their uterus and womb as a disadvantage. It's not hard to see the incredibly absurd problem there.
However, she and the man should be held accountable for their actions that effect other people which would include having children for whom they cannot properly provide.It's statements like these which make me feel that more birth control is needed...
A woman is accountable to herself and God, most certainly not to you and she is not owned by men and their whims. If you don't like that then that's your problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?