Secular society has found the ideal non-Christian symbol for a Christian festival - Santa Claus. He may be descended from a Christian Saint, but in his modern western form, all trace of that has been lost. The fat-bellied, red-suited, bearded Santa is more a symbol of pagan consumerism than anything to do with Christianity.
So should we collude with this? Should we go along with the majority and put up pictures of Santa, tell children about him? Pretend that Santa brings their Christmas gifts?
I can see several problems with following the crowd:
1) Santa provides an alternative focus to Jesus, Mary and Joseph for children.
2) Santa is a fictional (pagan) character who displaces the historic Christian Saint, St Nicholas. Wouldn't it be better to teach children the reality? There is no Santa. There IS St Nicholas?
3) When children learn they have been lied to by their parents, and that Santa does not exist, do they not then distrust more, and eventually wonder whether the stories about God and Jesus are all lies too?
So should we collude with this? Should we go along with the majority and put up pictures of Santa, tell children about him? Pretend that Santa brings their Christmas gifts?
I can see several problems with following the crowd:
1) Santa provides an alternative focus to Jesus, Mary and Joseph for children.
2) Santa is a fictional (pagan) character who displaces the historic Christian Saint, St Nicholas. Wouldn't it be better to teach children the reality? There is no Santa. There IS St Nicholas?
3) When children learn they have been lied to by their parents, and that Santa does not exist, do they not then distrust more, and eventually wonder whether the stories about God and Jesus are all lies too?
It's just a fairy tale, after all, isn't it.