Baloney. You've been insisting that Cosmoquest and mainstream consensus is something that I should worry about. Why? You simply avoid all the hard questions.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I do not incorporate either into my worldview.
I look at it with awe and wonder. But it does not shape the way I live my life or interact with my everyday world.
If it were somehow different (expanding/static/eternal/contracting) I don't see that it would affect the price of milk at the market.
What is your position?
And Michael, in regards to the cosmology theory of (Lambda-CDM) and (Panetheism) that you brought up, which one do you accept?
.
.
No. You're coming in late in the game. It happened 2000 years ago. But instead of believing the history of it, you believed the history story that was a ploy to draw out the riff raff, to separate [by intelligent design] the wheat from the chaff. Both stories are riddled, causing one to choose. You did not choose wisely...or should I say, "Professing to be wise, they became fools."I'll play this game.
You can't "miss" anything in this day and age. Except for Bigfoot, and the pesky extraterrestrial aliens that occasionally abduct people, it gets recorded and posted somewhere.
If it just happened, you should have at least recorded it with your cell phone camera.
What matters to me is that I'd like to see further discussion and answer to the question posed in post#685: "... of why you accept one cosmology theory (Lambda-CDM) and reject another (Panetheism)."
That's a great question worthy of an answer. I know folks who have integrated both into how they view the cosmos.
.
No. You're coming in late in the game. It happened 2000 years ago. But instead of believing the history of it, you believed the history story that was a ploy to draw out the riff raff, to separate [by intelligent design] the wheat from the chaff. Both stories are riddled, causing one to choose. You did not choose wisely...or should I say, "Professing to be wise, they became fools."
Meanwhile, your playbook offers no more evidence of its claims...except those from your own play book. Which, by your own rules...is not admissible.
No. Sorry, but your limited vocabulary doesn't have a word for it...well, it does, but you have not learned it.
...
"Imaginary" would also work for what he describes.I believe the word is "fantasy".
Nobody. That was the intent of my comment.
What matters to me is that I'd like to see further discussion and answer to the question posed in post#685: "... of why you accept one cosmology theory (Lambda-CDM) and reject another (Panetheism)."
That's a great question worthy of an answer. I know folks who have integrated both into how they view the cosmos.
.
I believe the word is "fantasy".
I can the the Universe as well. I just don't call it "God".
Quote where have I done this, keeping in mind that the appeal to authority is not fallacious when it is an actual authority.He's been appealing to authority throughout this thread,
Or, I am speaking honestly. Has that occurred to you?but apparently it's easier for him to feign neutrality since he has no logical explanation for preferring one over the other.
You misrepresented what I have said. I don't see any value in repeating myself.Baloney. You've been insisting that Cosmoquest and mainstream consensus is something that I should worry about. Why? You simply avoid all the hard questions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?