You would have to be all knowing and omniscient to say conclusively: "there are no scientific arguments for creationism".
Yeah. Let me know if that ever happens.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Except that it's clearly not basic knowledge otherwise we wouldn't be having this discussion.
There are no scientific arguments for creationism because creationism isn't science.
You would have to be all knowing and omniscient to say conclusively: "there are no scientific arguments for creationism".
Yeah. Let me know if that ever happens.
Really has no bearing on what I said at all. Creationism isn't in a competition with any science because it's not even in the race. It's not even at the starting line. Heck, it's not even in the same state.
Okay I've watched the first 15 minutes and it's pretty bad.
Above is Lee Strobel's creationism documentary entitled "The Case For a Creator".
I first saw this documentary maybe 5 years ago and remember it as good content for anyone interested in alternatives to evolutionary theory. It is a good watch for those interested in the scientific side of creationism in general.
Please watch and enjoy~
And share other examples of science that christians might be interested in or learn from.
Creationism and evolution are competing theories.
The problem in my opinion is, people being skeptical only towards ideas which conflict with their own beliefs. Skepticism and questioning selectively target only that which differs from their own.
People need to know both competing theories to properly put things into perspective. But not many are willing to go that far to scrutinize and challenge their own beliefs and ideology.
Yet Creationists never seem to be able to put forward actual scientific evidence.Creationism and evolution are competing theories.
The problem in my opinion is, people being skeptical only towards ideas which conflict with their own beliefs. Skepticism and questioning selectively target only that which differs from their own.
People need to know both competing theories to properly put things into perspective. But not many are willing to go that far to scrutinize and challenge their own beliefs and ideology.
And you would have to be all knowing and omniscient to say that evolution is being pushed by a shadowy worldwide group to undercut creationism.
As said before, its basic history.
There are always movers and shakers who have the money, power and means to make things happen in the world.
In human history, which demographic would you say wields the most political power and has been responsible for the majority of trends?
Yet Creationists never seem to be able to put forward actual scientific evidence.
Except that they aren't competing theories. Creationism isn't a theory nor a hypothesis. It's just religion disguised as science and it falls heavily against any sort of scrutiny.
Claiming that "Transitional Fossils have never been found". Just the human lineage alone has a multitude of fossils showing a gradual change from a more chimp like ancestor to modern man.
So, I think for now I will stop watching this video, unless 1rreducibly Complex can actually present some scientific evidence?
Religion and atheism are in competition.
Creationism and evolution are mere offshoots of it.
Yeah, when all else fails, bring on the conspiracy theories to try and explain why no-one agrees with you!!
Serious question now: would you admit that you could be wrong about anything and everything you know?
So how do you explain Christians who accept evolution as scientific fact then?
Looking around the world today. Who has more influence and power.
Ruling elites or yourself?
If you think its a "conspiracy theory" to say ruling elites are responsible for the large majority of agendas and trends.
I don't know what to say.
They accept the basic concept of certain genetic traits being passed on to offspring.
But reject the philosophical aspect of evolution which claims the process is random or wholly unrelated to a Creator or God.
Do you have a source for that?Einstein had issues with the "spooky action at a distance" element of quantum entanglement.
Which the "God does not play dice with the universe" quotation does not cite.
The quote has nothing to do with quantum mechanics.
Yeah, no spit that the ruling elite have more power. That's why they're called 'the ruling elite'. But you're going into a whole different territory when you say "Hey, these guys want to suppress a religious view from the specifically American brand of Christianity that has only be around for the last hundred years or so!".
Like I said before, most christians function on faith alone.
And neglect the truth seeking and knowledge aspect of christianity.
Religion and atheism are in competition.
Creationism and evolution are mere offshoots of it.
It's also nonsense.If it is true that Darwin's theory of evolution says all plants today evolved from a single plant. Then transitional fossils revealing branch points from a single origin ancestor should exist. That's the basic argument, which you somehow seem to have not fully understood. Ditto with what you said about abiogenesis.
Do you have a source for that?
He was absolutely was talking about quantum mechanics.
What Einstein meant by ‘God does not play dice’
Christians in the united states are the strongest supporters of 2nd amendment gun rights for citizens. Christians believe God grants them rights and freedoms.
Atheists in australia the UK and elsewhere have no such ideology.
Which ideology are ruling elites more likely to target and attack given the above description.
I don't know if I can find a good source for it. Here's a hint.
We can see from Stephen Hawking's later retort to Einstein.
That quantum mechanics was not the topic they were addressing.
These are very controversial quotations as they invoke creationism to a degree. But not many know or are aware of it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?