Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No. The only people on earth will be those who chose to believe in Jesus. The rest are evicted. That is why it will be heavenly, no Satan or evil people.So nothing happens... we just feel as if we're in permanent bliss?
(No, not that the earth is round...)Which theory? That the Earth is round?
You can see all of the planets out to Saturn or even Neptune with telescopes you can buy yourself.
If we are talking about exoplanets, the scientists list all of their methods and materials for measuring transits and Doppler shifts in their peer reviewed papers. Almost every measurement in science is "altered" in some fashion, even by something as simple has subtracting out background.
What is your distrust of NASA based on?(No, not that the earth is round...)
So, then, there should be no problem for NASA to give us some higher resolution photos that aren't doctored, smoothed, generated or concept.
But, they dont. All that has been given has been computer generated images, smoothed images, artifacts, etc.
Which I said is find for the purposes of concepts, but there needs to be a clear transparency on what "pictures" are being presented: concept/CGI or real.
But, I am not talking about exoplanets. We have yet to receive clear, higher resolution images of our backyard that has not been altered. If I can see Ceres with my telescope, NASA should be able to provide recent, high resolution photos (or feeds) of Ceres - not simple concept art with the same cloud formations and landmass face.
Again, this would be FINE if we are only talking about the theory of the planets (composition, distance, orbit, etc.)
Concept art is concept art.
I don't distrust NASA, I just want non CGI images of the things they purport are existent. If I can see it with my telescope, NASA should be able to provide much higher resolution photos with much clearer details.What is your distrust of NASA based on?
Here are some pictures of the planets without CGI. A few of them have false colour applied so the varying colour is clearer.I don't distrust NASA, I just want non CGI images of the things they purport are existent. If I can see it with my telescope, NASA should be able to provide much higher resolution photos with much clearer details.
It is really a simple request, or query.
Let's give you the benefit of the doubt here. Tell us exactly how transit data does this.
(No, not that the earth is round...)
So, then, there should be no problem for NASA to give us some higher resolution photos that aren't doctored, smoothed, generated or concept.
I don't distrust NASA, I just want non CGI images of the things they purport are existent. If I can see it with my telescope, NASA should be able to provide much higher resolution photos with much clearer details.
It is really a simple request, or query.
I would like to see one picture of any heavenly body in our solar system (besides the moon and sun) that isn't computer generated from NASA.
Or, even one of earth that has not been generated...
Which planet, specifically, would you like to see a real picture of?I don't distrust NASA, I just want non CGI images of the things they purport are existent. If I can see it with my telescope, NASA should be able to provide much higher resolution photos with much clearer details.
It is really a simple request, or query.
I used to be an "ameteur" astronomer, and while you do see some very interesting activity in the heavens, it doesn't match up to the CGI images presented by NASA - which is how I know the photos have been edited, and it is also the reason why I am asking for NASA photos without editing, smoothing, CGI, or artifacts.
I would like to see one picture of any heavenly body in our solar system (besides the moon and sun) that isn't computer generated from NASA.
Or, even one of earth that has not been generated...
Here are some pictures of the planets without CGI. A few of them have Fajar colour applied so the varying colour is clearer.
Why the suspiciousness around NASA?
What are you dubious about? Just exo-planets, or all of space?
So what if they do?
What is the point of all this?
Most images from the solar system are digital, but that's because they were transmitted that way from the satellite (there's no way to get film back from 3 billion miles away). CGI really only used for images of objects outside of the solar system.
Which planet, specifically, would you like to see a real picture of?
Any body in our solar system would be fine - besides the moon and sun (or other bodies that can be seen with the naked eye.)
In general, I am speaking about the outer planets - J/S/N/U/P(?). And, maybe their moons.
Didn't I just say I was not suspicious of NASA? It was a simple question:
Where are the higher quality raw photos without edit? It should be easy to provide if I can see it (and take a picture) from my telescope.
There shouldn't be a reason why we can't see raw, unedited photos from NASA - with absolutely no edit. That wild be profitable for people that understand the physics of what is going on - to draw educated conclusions.
Sure we have. Here is a fairly high resolution raw photo of Jupiter taken by the Voyager spacecraft in 1979.(No, not that the earth is round...)
So, then, there should be no problem for NASA to give us some higher resolution photos that aren't doctored, smoothed, generated or concept.
But, they dont. All that has been given has been computer generated images, smoothed images, artifacts, etc.
Which I said is find for the purposes of concepts, but there needs to be a clear transparency on what "pictures" are being presented: concept/CGI or real.
But, I am not talking about exoplanets. We have yet to receive clear, higher resolution images of our backyard that has not been altered.
Do you have any idea of what it would take to get a live feed from Ceres?If I can see Ceres with my telescope, NASA should be able to provide recent, high resolution photos (or feeds) of Ceres - not simple concept art with the same cloud formations and landmass face.
Do you have any idea what NASA goes through to get these images and what the limitations are of receiving data from something that is over a quarter million miles from the sun?Again, this would be FINE if we are only talking about the theory of the planets (composition, distance, orbit, etc.)
Concept art is concept art.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?