• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Research3 said:
Yes they were. I guess you've never researched the Aryan invasion of India. Still today you can see the genetic input and divide between the N. Indians and the South Indians (Dravidians).

According to your 'research' on wikipedia white people are everywhere, including the Amazon, Ethiopian and Egypt. But not Britain. If you were a troll I'd say you're an 'afrocentrist' trying to give white people a bad name.

Research3 said:
- Never been banned here.
- Your general behaviour is anti-Christian. In the other thread you joined called people ''nutters'' who don't agree with your liberal Christianity and then left. I've personally seen better behaviour from Atheists.

- So who were Research1 and Research2?
- I had no idea the word 'nutters' was so offensive, forgive me for damging your fragile ego.

Research3 said:
Nowhere does the Bible say Jesus was God (Yahweh) but you can debate this in other relevant sections. Many Christians on this forum don't believe Jesus was God incarnate and don't believe in the trinity.

Clearly you have never the read the Bible (which would explain a lot). Some Christians are also '9/11-truthers' and think the Japanese tsunami was a punishment from God. I'm not inclined to believe anything they say either.

Research3 said:
I never claimed God literally created. Only 'created' in an ANE context. I don't believe in mainstream Biblical creationism and never have.

So where did white people come from? Surely they didn't evolve?
Incidently yet again you didn't answer one of my questions: do you actually worship your own race?
 
Upvote 0

Research3

Avatar photo: Charles Ottley Groom Napier
May 24, 2011
123
1
✟258.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Notedstrangeperson, please stop trolling my thread, thanks. You did this before. and now i think i'll take Granpa's advice and put you on ignore again.

Two posts back i claimed the indigenous Britons were Caucasian Basques. This has been proven by Brian Sykes, and the top university scholars. The native peoples of Britain are the white-British, who are racially Caucasian. No where have i claimed the opposite and as an ethno-nationalist this is a major part of my political worldview. You can find my threads where i have posted this for years.

Basically you are just a troll who is reversing my beliefs to wind me up. Unlike you though i'm not here to insult other or fool around. This thread was set up to discuss serpent seed. Yet from post one you trolled and started a whole irrelevant discussion on race. You then stalked my other threads and called proponents of the serpent doctrine 'nutters'.

Nothing about your behaviour is Christian. I highly suspect you are just an atheist troll given your persistant wrecking of my threads (which you have done for several months now).
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Research3 said:
Notedstrangeperson, please stop trolling my thread, thanks. You did this before. and now i think i'll take Granpa's advice and put you on ignore again.

You've run out of answers and are backing down. Didn't even bother to answer my last question.

Research3 said:
Basically you are just a troll who is reversing my beliefs to wind me up. Unlike you though i'm not here to insult other or fool around.

Further confirming my suspicion that you no sense of irony or hypocrisy.

Research3 said:
Nothing about your behaviour is Christian. I highly suspect you are just an atheist troll given your persistant wrecking of my threads (which you have done for several months now).

Your arguments insult my nation, my race and my religion. If you post lies and distortions I'll confront them. It's not my problem if you are too narrow-minded and weak-willed to deal with people who disagree with you.
 
Upvote 0

Research3

Avatar photo: Charles Ottley Groom Napier
May 24, 2011
123
1
✟258.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
''So who were Research1 and Research2?''

- Accounts that are still up, that have far more rep points than you have earned in 3 years - and yet they were only a few months old.

I think most posters on this site block you. In 3 years virtually no one has credited your posts, given your behaviour here it's not surprising.

Also reviewing your only created thread, reveals you only create threads to attack creationists (another similarity you have with the atheists). I see the only threads you have created since i left and returned are threads linking creationists to holocaust deniers. Who started this argument? Richard Dawkins did.

I think most Christians on this site see through you and know your real agenda here.
 
Upvote 0

Notedstrangeperson

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2008
3,430
110
36
✟19,524.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
I thought I was on your ignore list?

Research3 said:
I think most Christians on this site see through you and know your real agenda here.

Curses! You've seen through my disguise! And all this time I though I could disguise my evil heathen ways by arguing against atheism down in the Society section.
BTW is these the comparison between Creatonists and holocaust deniers you're talking about?

Article on Dawkin's closemindedness

What else do you believe? (Creationists only please)

And your previous accounts has far fewer reputation points than I do. You're one of the worst "researchers" I've ever met.
 
Upvote 0

granpa

Noahide/Rationalist
Apr 23, 2007
2,518
68
California
✟3,072.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

theFijian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2003
8,898
476
West of Scotland
Visit site
✟86,155.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
It says God is a spirit, but in Genesis God is described as a literal man ''walking''. Elsewhere God is physically described as having a nose and ears (see quotes i put up).
That's because in ANE cultures it was normal to anthropomorphise their 'gods'
Nowhere does the Bible say Jesus was God (Yahweh) but you can debate this in other relevant sections. Many Christians on this forum don't believe Jesus was God incarnate and don't believe in the trinity.
And they are kept to peddling their anti-Christ views to the unorthodox theology section. Those liberal Christian have to rip this passage out of their Bibles:

Isaiah 44:6 - Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts: "I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no god.

Or do you deny that Christ is the Redeemer? Christ is most certainly called Jahweh. However some 'christian's rip these pages out of their bibles to suit their socio-political ends (eg, to justify racism, white-supremacy) as they do with all these following pages speaking to the deity of Christ and the triune nature of God.

Isaiah 9:6 - For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

John 1:1,2 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.

John 5:18 - That is why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbathm but he wsa calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

John 8:58 - Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am. So they picked up stones to throw at him

John 10:30-33 - I and the Father are one." [sup]31[/sup] The Jews picked up stones again to stone him. [sup]32[/[sup]Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you going to stone me?" [sup]33[/sup]The Jews answered him, "It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you but for blasphemy, because you, being a man, make yourself God."

John 20:28,29 - Thomas answered him, "My Lord and My God!" Jesus said to him, "Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."

Col 1:19 - For in him the fullness of God was pleased to dwell

Col 2:9 - For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily

Only a liberal Christian, or perhaps someone quite stupid, could read the gospel of John and not realise that it continually speaks of the divinity of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

theFijian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2003
8,898
476
West of Scotland
Visit site
✟86,155.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Your arguments insult my nation, my race and my religion. If you post lies and distortions I'll confront them.

As grievous as those things are it is more importantly an insult to the Cross of Christ. It is so much a distortion of the Gospel it can no longer be called the Gospel, it is an abomination and anyone peddling it can rightly be called non-christian.
 
Upvote 0

Research3

Avatar photo: Charles Ottley Groom Napier
May 24, 2011
123
1
✟258.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
What do your personal attacks of Christians of other denominations have to do with the thread topic of the serpent seed doctrine?

Don't you also claim to oppose fascism etc? Yet you attack and smear other Christian viewpoints very viciously like a fascist. Please try to get it into your narrow brain that there are many different viewpoints, not everyone is the same.
 
Upvote 0

theFijian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2003
8,898
476
West of Scotland
Visit site
✟86,155.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married

Not all these 'denominations' are Christian. Not all these viewpoints, especially yours, get to be labelled 'Christian'.

Gal 1:8 - But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. [sup]9[/sup] As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.

Jude 4 - For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

This 'Christianity' of yours is contrary the gospel preached by Paul and the apostles, it is accused. You who deny the our Lord and Master Jesus Christ are condemned by your own words

How ironic that you are not slow to dish out the bile yet quick to display faux outrage when others defend Christ and his gospel of Grace.
 
Upvote 0

hagiazo7

Non-Denominational
Aug 3, 2011
23
1
✟22,652.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Responding to post #1 by Research3

Hi! How are you doing?

“In Babylonian/Sumerian these appear as Zalmat-Qaqadi (dark race) while the Sarku (light race). Sarku = Sethites. Zalmat-Qaqadi = dark race.”

Okay, I can see where this is going. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt though. Are you saying that the progeny of Eve and the serpent was black people? The “dark race”?

I personally don’t hold that view, that the progeny of Eve and the serpent were black people or jews or Asians or any other non-white skinned people. That is what christian identity believes. That all other inferior races were spawn from from Eve and the serpent.

That is where christian identity and I part ways. I believe that God created all race of people, not satan. Satan may have messed with the gene pool of Eve, but he can’t “create” a race of people like God can. I think the progeny of Eve and the serpent was cain, the father of the kenite race. Kenites are NOT black people, they are NOT jews NOR asian . The Hebrew word for kenite is: Strong’s 7017 Qeyniy/Qiyniy; patronymically from 7014; a kenite. 7014, Qayin: Cain.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0