Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
WalksWithChrist said:I came here to learn more about SDA which I have been wondering about for a while. But all I keep hearing in a neverending debate about the Sabbath. Could we stay on topic pretty please? Thanks.
Thats interesting.They believe that Sunday is the future Mark of the Beast,
Thanks! I have heard a little about soul sleep. Can you fill in some on this? I think my boss who is SDA mentioned it once. I didn't ask her too much about it cuz...she's my boss!deu58 said:Hi Walks with Christ
Well, The SDA Sabbath message is the primary reason for the existence of the SDA church, They call it the third angels message,
They believe that Sunday is the future Mark of the Beast, They are the chosen peolple of God that have been called to lead us all out of our churchs and into their church so we can celebrate the Sabbath truth,
All Protestant Sunday keeping church's are apostate church's. But the SDA's believe that there are still true Christians in the apostate church's and their mission from God is to make them aware of the Sabbath message,
If you are a Christian and have never heard the SDA Sabbath message then you are safe in your faith, BUT, And a big but it is, If you hear their Sabbath message and reject it you are now an enemy of God and have lost your salvation,
They believe that we the apostate protestant church are the false prophet of the anti Christ spoken of in Rev, 13
Re 13:11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
Re 13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
Re 13:13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
Re 13:14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
Re 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
Re 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Re 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
The anti Christ of course is the Catholic church, SDA's believe that we the aposatate Protestant church will join forces with Rome and make war on all Sabbath keepers and hunt them down and kill them because they will not accept the mark of the beast which is Sunday worship,
That is pretty much it in a nutshell, To learn more about SDA's you may want to start another thread asking about SDA beliefs, But with in a few posts most likly somebody is going to turn it into another Sabbath thread,
There are more beliefs like the Investigative judgment which teaches that atonement was not finished at the cross and is still an on going work in heavenly temple, Soul sleep etc but the Sabbath is the SDA biggie.
yours in Christ
deu 58
WalksWithChrist said:I came here to learn more about SDA which I have been wondering about for a while. But all I keep hearing in a neverending debate about the Sabbath. Could we stay on topic pretty please? Thanks.
WalksWithChrist said:I came here to learn more about SDA which I have been wondering about for a while. But all I keep hearing in a neverending debate about the Sabbath. Could we stay on topic pretty please? Thanks.
adam332 said:OP said,
"Must be nice to be Catholic and have it already settled."
Easy for them to do, they think they have the power to rewrite God's holy word.
Dan 7:25 And he shall speak [great] words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
2Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
deu58 said:Hi Adam
Can You Say Clear Word??? Can You say Spirit of Prophecy???
The Catholics have not even come close to rewriting the scriptures as you SDA have, With the Clear Word your denomination started at Rev1:1 and all the way to Rev 22:21 completely rewrote the Scripture to fit your doctrines,
In The Beginning you SDA's even tried to call it a bible but the so many people were against it the eventually the word bible was dropped from the title,
<B>A letter from David Newman, Editor of _Ministry_magazine. (1994)</B>
July 28, 1994
Now for my personal reactions and you are free to quote me if you wish. Understand that this is my personal opinion and does not represent any official stance of the SDA Church.
Dr. Jack Blanco, chair of the religion department at Southern College and the author of the Clear Word Bible is trying to make the Bible clearer which is most commendable. He has done an outstanding job except for the problems I cite below.
He makes it clear in the first paragraph of his Preface that "This is not a new translation but a paraphrase of the Scriptures. It is not intended for in-depth study or for public reading in churches." Unfortunately most people do not read prefaces so this very important information will be lost. Already I am hearing reports of it being used in the pulpit and as a textbook in teaching religion.
Second the author misunderstands the meaning of the word "paraphrase." A paraphrase is not a loose rendering of someone elses' words with added commentary. A paraphrase whether you use the dictionary definition or the definition used in active listening simply means restating the words of another in your own words without adding to or subtracting from the original meaning.
A cursory examination of the Clear Word Bible reveals the prolific addition of many ideas not found in Scripture.
Thirdly, where Scripture is ambiguous the author removes the ambiguities. One is left not having to make hardly any interpretations for him or herself. The author has done it for you. God evidently intended that each reader struggle with the text and decide personally how to resolve these ambiguities and tensions. Two quick examples come to mind. In 1 Cor. 15:29 we find the difficult phrase baptized for the dead. The author resolves the difficulty by telling us that being baptized in the hope of seeing dead loved ones is meaningless if you do not believe in the resurrection. Revelation 1:10 no longer has us puzzling over which day of the week the Lord's day is. The author tells us that it is the Sabbath.
Fourthly, the author has intertwined so much of Ellen White into his commentary that the general effect has been to canonize Ellen White. The author adds to Scripture in Genesis 2:25 by following Ellen White and saying that Adam and Eve were clothed with a garment of light. Daniel 8:14 is now clear that the judgment began after 2300 prophetic years.
Fifthly, the title chosen for this work is most unfortunate. This is not a Bible. It is a personal commentary on Scripture but it is not the Bible. Yet the title clearly identifies it as a Bible. It is really a specialized commentary on the Bible.
Sixthly, while the author says it is a paraphrase the format inside is not that of a paraphrase but that of the King James Bible. While most modern versions format by paragraph this "Bible" is formatted verse by verse so that it clearly looks like a traditional bible.
Seventh, I fear what our critics will say when they find how much Ellen White has contributed to this "bible" without any credit being given to her at all. It would be interesting to find out what percentage of this work owes itself to Ellen White.
In summary. While I believe that the intentions of the author were honorable and while I am sure he has been greatly blessed I fear that this commentary will eventually confuse people more than it will help people. Already one person has brought it to my Sabbath School class and read from it. _People_will_begin_memorizing_it_and_quoting_it_as_Scripture. I know that this was not the intent of the author but that is what the practical effects will be.
I am sure that the author does not believe that the words of Revelation 22:18 "I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book." apply to this version. But since it is called a Bible some might draw the opposite conclusions. He should have made it far clearer on the conver and in the formatting that this is not another Bible but a personal commentary on Scripture. I hope that the author would withdraw or at the very least drastically revise this book.
Yours for the uplifting of God's true Word,
J. David Newman
Editor _Ministry_
Cliff2 said:Have you ever opened up a "Clear Word"?
Inside the front cover it says it is a parphrase and is not intended for public reading in churches or in depth study.
Take a break and you will see that the Clear Word was only ever intended for devotional insights.
If you do not like it then go back to the KJV or another translation.
No one here is promoting and to my knowledge never has.
Cliff2 said:Have you ever opened up a "Clear Word"?
Inside the front cover it says it is a parphrase and is not intended for public reading in churches or in depth study.
Take a break and you will see that the Clear Word was only ever intended for devotional insights.
If you do not like it then go back to the KJV or another translation.
No one here is promoting and to my knowledge never has.
deu58 said:Hi cliff
No, But you SDA's are always charging others with changing times and laws and your church has taken it upon it self to change the entire bible,
If I belonged to a church that actually rewrote the entire bible for what ever purposes I would not be to quick to advertise it to the whole world either,
But you really should stop charging others for something you have done on a much grander scale than others,
yours in Christ
deu 58
Cliff2 said:Let's get to the truth of this.
No one has changed the Bible from the SDA Church. It says in the book that it is a paraphrase.
No one has rewrote the Bible.
The KJV and the NKJ along with all the other translations are still there.
There are even other paraphrases out there on the market as well.
How is it intended for devotional insights when it actually contradicts actual scripture? Are we to be led to believe that is allright to use contradictory text when devoting out time to studying scripture? This makes no sense at all to be quite frank. Please explain how using a so called paraphrase that changes the actual meaning of scripture is good for anything at all, especially for devotion.Cliff2 said:Have you ever opened up a "Clear Word"?
Inside the front cover it says it is a parphrase and is not intended for public reading in churches or in depth study.
Take a break and you will see that the Clear Word was only ever intended for devotional insights.
If you do not like it then go back to the KJV or another translation.
No one here is promoting and to my knowledge never has.
flesh99 said:How is it intended for devotional insights when it actually contradicts actual scripture? Are we to be led to believe that is allright to use contradictory text when devoting out time to studying scripture? This makes no sense at all to be quite frank. Please explain how using a so called paraphrase that changes the actual meaning of scripture is good for anything at all, especially for devotion.
flesh99 said:How is it intended for devotional insights when it actually contradicts actual scripture? Are we to be led to believe that is allright to use contradictory text when devoting out time to studying scripture? This makes no sense at all to be quite frank. Please explain how using a so called paraphrase that changes the actual meaning of scripture is good for anything at all, especially for devotion.
Have you ever opened up a "Clear Word"?
Inside the front cover it says it is a parphrase and is not intended for public reading in churches or in depth study.
Take a break and you will see that the Clear Word was only ever intended for devotional insights.
If you do not like it then go back to the KJV or another translation.
If you have never used it then how do you know what it says inside on the front cover????As I do not use it you would have to give me the actual quote before I could comment on it.
deu58 presents numerous errors here: http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=16896371&postcount=93 but it was you who said it was a devotional tool. I am asking you to defend your statement or renounce a book full of falsehoods that is put out and therefore endorsed by the SDA denominationCliff2 said:As I do not use it you would have to give me the actual quote before I could comment on it.
WalksWithChrist said:Thanks! I have heard a little about soul sleep. Can you fill in some on this? I think my boss who is SDA mentioned it once. I didn't ask her too much about it cuz...she's my boss!
deu58 said:Hi Walks with Christ
Not much to tell on this really, They simply believe that when the body dies the soul is asleep with the dead body in the grave, The soul will awaken with the new body at the resurrection, The SDA's did not originate the soul sleep doctrine,
They use several selective verses to promote this doctrine,
Here is a thread where we are discussing hell and soul sleep, Adam holds a slightly different view in that he believes the soul returns to God but does not remember anything, He uses the same verse the SDA;s use though to support his belief
http://www.christianforums.com/t1817421--the-rich-man-and-lazarus.html&page=2
Starting at post 20 Adam 332 starts to present his argument for soul sleep
yours in Christ
deu 58
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?