- Apr 14, 2003
- 7,500
- 1,331
- 72
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
[FONT="]The Life Sketches of Ellen White is the autobiography of Ellen White, the founder of the Seventh Day Adventists, who started having visions as a teenager.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Im sure that the Adventists can correct me if I am wrong. In The Life Sketches of Ellen White, she never refers to any person that she disagrees with by name. Only those who agree with her and accept her wisdom and her visions are dignified with names. Everyone else is a blur.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Even more extreme, anyone that she disagrees with seems to become an agent of the Devil. For instance, on p. 140-141 of the Kindle edition:[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]I saw that my husband must not give up the paper, for Satan was trying to drive him to take just such a step, and was working through agents to do this.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Normally it would be presumptuous of a mortal to claim to know exactly what Satan is trying to do. She gives no vision to back up her assumption, and this is typical. She simply assumes that those who are telling her husband that his health problems will not allow him to continue to run a small paper are agents of Satan.[/FONT]
[FONT="]This isnt the only time that EW pegs someone as an agent of the devil with little or no evidence. : At a meeting, two men that she doesnt like are present. After her husband addresses the meeting: These agents of the enemy were then so bound as to be unable to exert their baleful influence again that night. Page 82, Life Sketches[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]It doesnt occur to EW that these men could simply be mistaken or misguided.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Another term that she uses for those she doesnt like is children of darkness, as on p. 135.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]*[/FONT]
[FONT="]*
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Im sure that the Adventists can correct me if I am wrong. In The Life Sketches of Ellen White, she never refers to any person that she disagrees with by name. Only those who agree with her and accept her wisdom and her visions are dignified with names. Everyone else is a blur.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Even more extreme, anyone that she disagrees with seems to become an agent of the Devil. For instance, on p. 140-141 of the Kindle edition:[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]I saw that my husband must not give up the paper, for Satan was trying to drive him to take just such a step, and was working through agents to do this.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Normally it would be presumptuous of a mortal to claim to know exactly what Satan is trying to do. She gives no vision to back up her assumption, and this is typical. She simply assumes that those who are telling her husband that his health problems will not allow him to continue to run a small paper are agents of Satan.[/FONT]
[FONT="]This isnt the only time that EW pegs someone as an agent of the devil with little or no evidence. : At a meeting, two men that she doesnt like are present. After her husband addresses the meeting: These agents of the enemy were then so bound as to be unable to exert their baleful influence again that night. Page 82, Life Sketches[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]It doesnt occur to EW that these men could simply be mistaken or misguided.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Another term that she uses for those she doesnt like is children of darkness, as on p. 135.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]*[/FONT]
[FONT="]*
[/FONT]
Last edited: