Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Scott's EU Birkeland Current Blunders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 66129120" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>You mean laboratory demonstrated ideas do you not? Versus what, your purely theoretical musings of matter that is not matter? Of bent nothing that accelerates too? </p><p></p><p>You mean your theories of Birkeland Currents and heliosphere's, that each and every one of them was falsified????? On <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliosphere" target="_blank">which model of anything</a> do you claim any right to even have a valid say in the matter?</p><p></p><p>"The IBEX results are truly remarkable! What we are seeing in these maps does not match with any of the previous theoretical models of this region."</p><p></p><p>You are going to claim Scott is wrong based upon your theoretical models that have already one and all been falsified? Are those the theoretical models you claim as support?????</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why don't you just get over it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 66129120, member: 332164"] You mean laboratory demonstrated ideas do you not? Versus what, your purely theoretical musings of matter that is not matter? Of bent nothing that accelerates too? You mean your theories of Birkeland Currents and heliosphere's, that each and every one of them was falsified????? On [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliosphere"]which model of anything[/URL] do you claim any right to even have a valid say in the matter? "The IBEX results are truly remarkable! What we are seeing in these maps does not match with any of the previous theoretical models of this region." You are going to claim Scott is wrong based upon your theoretical models that have already one and all been falsified? Are those the theoretical models you claim as support????? Why don't you just get over it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Scott's EU Birkeland Current Blunders
Top
Bottom