• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Scientists can’t explain why Guadalupe tilma hasn’t decayed

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
182,180
65,929
Woods
✟5,863,019.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
After nearly 500 years, the tilma bearing the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe is still perfectly preserved, when it should have decayed.

Continued below.
 

AJTony1313

Member
May 2, 2022
9
2
82
Florence
✟28,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I also do not know the reason the tilma has not decayed, but I have studied this subject extensively over the last year. Throughout history, many people have had the chance to study the tilma, and some observers have concluded that the tilma is made from hemp fibers. Hemp fibers would easily last 500 years, thereby solving the puzzle.

So, the question for hundreds of years is whether the tilma is made of cactus/agave (quick decay) or hemp (500+ years stability). Over all these years, there has been only two scientific fiber analyses reported. The first, and likely the most laborious study was done at the National University of Mexico in 1946 by a biologist Isaac Ochoterena. His rigorous analysis concluded that the tilma was made from agave fibers.

The only other fiber analysis was done by a qualified scientist in 1999-2000, Professor John J. Chiment from Cornell University. He concluded that the tilma was made of hemp fibers.

Over the centuries, various people, usually artists have made conclusions about the fiber by use of only a magnifying glass. Many concluded agave, and some hemp, and the most recent observation in 1982 was during the last restoration of the tilma by Rosales. Using a 20 to 80X magnification, he concluded that the fiber was a hemp mixture.

So therefore, to date there are only two laboratory analyses performed, Ochoterena in 1946 and Chiment in 1999, with conflicting conclusions.

Now the rest of the story. Chiment did not publish his results, only because the fiber he tested was from a reliquary sample, which had no confirmed provenance. Ochoterena did publish his results, however, his sample was also from a reliquary sample without known provenance.

Conclusion, in the last 492 years, there has been no known sample removed directly from the tilma and sent for fiber analyses.

Therefore, that is why “Scientists can’t explain why Guadalupe tilma hasn’t decayed.” In scientific logic, this is known as an “Argument from Ignorance.” We still await the answer, is it hemp, or is it a miracle.
 
Upvote 0