Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Scientific results here and now apply to there and then
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pitabread" data-source="post: 74463792" data-attributes="member: 394892"><p>You should know there are also numerous non-radiometric methods for dating things, and that multiple methods are correlated with each other. For example: <a href="https://thenaturalhistorian.com/2012/11/12/varves-chronology-suigetsu-c14-radiocarbon-callibration-creationism/" target="_blank">Lake Suigetsu and the 60,000 Year Varve Chronology</a></p><p></p><p>Why would both radiometric and non-radiometric methods yield correlated dates if radioactive decay rates varied in the past? It makes no sense.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You do appear to be arguing for a deceptive universe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pitabread, post: 74463792, member: 394892"] You should know there are also numerous non-radiometric methods for dating things, and that multiple methods are correlated with each other. For example: [URL='https://thenaturalhistorian.com/2012/11/12/varves-chronology-suigetsu-c14-radiocarbon-callibration-creationism/']Lake Suigetsu and the 60,000 Year Varve Chronology[/URL] Why would both radiometric and non-radiometric methods yield correlated dates if radioactive decay rates varied in the past? It makes no sense. You do appear to be arguing for a deceptive universe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Scientific results here and now apply to there and then
Top
Bottom