Scientific dadaism?

[Deadbolt]

So, I know I kind of lost interest in posting here but a thought occurred to me concerning some of the more... well known creationists on this site.

Only them specifically, I think you know who I mean. I'm in no way placing their ideas in the same league as mainstream creationists.

My thought is: Could the ideas put forth by those such as Dad and AV1 actually transcend the argument of creation vs evolution and become in of themselves a kind of dadaist artform?

 

[AV1611VET]

My thought is: Could the ideas put forth by those such as Dad and AV1 actually transcend the argument of creation vs evolution and become in of themselves a kind of dadaist artform?

Are you suggesting we're a cult?

Most of my arguments are backed by either Scripture or basic doctrine.

The rest I usually stipulate is my opinion.

Is there anything wrong with that?

 

[Deadbolt]

Are you suggesting we're a cult?

No. I'm suggesting that your writings can be interpreted as post modernist performance art.

Most of my arguments are backed by either Scripture or basic doctrine.

The rest I usually stipulate is my opinion.

Is there anything wrong with that?

No. There is nothing wrong with that. I like post-modernist performance art.

 

[AV1611VET]

No. I'm suggesting that your writings can be interpreted as post modernist performance art.

I suppose to those who don't know either Scripture or basic doctrine, they would be.

Do you fall into that category?

No. There is nothing wrong with that. I like post-modernist performance art.

And yet ...

So, I know I kind of lost interest in posting here...

 

[TLK Valentine]

Are you suggesting we're a cult?

No, you're a philosophical movement.

Is there anything wrong with that?

Would you care if there was?

 

[AV1611VET]

No, you're a philosophical movement.

Do you know of any others based on Scripture and basic doctrine?

Would you care if there was?

No -- your turn.

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

So, I know I kind of lost interest in posting here but a thought occurred to me concerning some of the more... well known creationists on this site.

Only them specifically, I think you know who I mean. I'm in no way placing their ideas in the same league as mainstream creationists.

My thought is: Could the ideas put forth by those such as Dad and AV1 actually transcend the argument of creation vs evolution and become in of themselves a kind of dadaist artform?

I think of it more as absurdist fiction. Like an Ionesco play.

"There are now many invisible people on stage."
Stage directions in The Chairs (1952)

 

[AV1611VET]

I think of it more as absurdist fiction.

Just out of curiosity, what's the difference here between Jesus walking on water and dad's split/merge model?

If one has come to the conclusion that God doesn't exist, isn't it just a matter of degrees?

 

[TLK Valentine]

Do you know of any others based on Scripture and basic doctrine?

I know of plenty -- Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, Episcopalian, Jehovah's Witness, ... the list go on and on.

No -- your turn.

So what are you whining about?

 

[AV1611VET]

I know of plenty -- Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, Episcopalian, Jehovah's Witness, ... the list go on and on.

Then what's this:

"dadaist artform"

... if everybody's doing it?

 

[TLK Valentine]

Then what's this:

"dadaist artform"

... if everybody's doing it?

Because "everyone's" not doing it, AV -- you're special.

 

[AV1611VET]

-- you're special.

I've known that since grade school!

 

[TLK Valentine]

I've known that since grade school!

We've known that since we met you