• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Science vs the Media :D

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Today's xkcd gave me such a chuckle.

significant.png


ETA: alt-text: 'So, we did the study again and found no link. It was probably a --' 'RESEARCH CONFLICTED ON GREEN JELLY BEAN/ACNE LINK; MORE STUDY RECOMMENDED'
 

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Did you see where it has been uncovered that the person who came out with the study linking vaccines with autism was in fact being paid by an attorney who needed that study to back his lawsuit?
Oh yes. It was an appallingly bad study even assuming it was honest. I remember we tore it to shreds in a class. And now it turns out the guy had to twist data even to make it that good. It's pathetic.
 
Upvote 0

metherion

Veteran
Aug 14, 2006
4,185
368
39
✟28,623.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
When I saw that, I lol'd. I also noticed that they did 20 jellybean colors, so with a 95% confidence interval, it would not be amiss that one of them might trigger that.

There's an SMBC that's similar, except it uses the f-word in it, and so I can't link it.

But it goes like this:

Scientist:
The new treatment led to the elimination of 10% of the cancer cells in rats.
HEADLINES: CANCER CURED!
Scientist:
No, we didn't cure cancer, we're just moving faster towards a treatment.
HEADLINES: TIME TRAVELED DISCOVERED!
Scientist:
Screw you!
HEADLINES:
SCIENTIST RAPES REPORTER!

Metherion
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Upisoft

CEO of a waterfal
Feb 11, 2006
4,885
131
Orbiting the Sun
✟35,777.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Not far from the truth.

Today I was watching a "prophet" on TV who was claiming he gets dreams about pyramids and how they were build.

His "proof" was he was born on very rare moment when the Sun was for a moment behind Jupiter.

I thought for a second and concluded this has to be very-very-very rare thing, so rare that actually this guy does not exist...

BTW on the question "How they have build the pyramids?" he answered "By using numbers".

Media --- madness...
 
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
When I saw that, I lol'd. I also noticed that they did 20 jellybean colors, so with a 95% confidence interval, it would not be amiss that one of them might trigger that.
You actually counted them? :thumbsup: I just looked at the lots of little panels and figured they'd be enough for that. It's a significant part of the lol factor either way ^_^

There's an SMBC that's similar, except it uses the f-word in it, and so I can't link it.
I think I saw that. Sounds strangely familiar. Of course, there are probably around a million similar jokes/cartoons circulating in the meme pool.

Not far from the truth.

Today I was watching a "prophet" on TV who was claiming he gets dreams about pyramids and how they were build.

His "proof" was he was born on very rare moment when the Sun was for a moment behind Jupiter.

I thought for a second and concluded this has to be very-very-very rare thing, so rare that actually this guy does not exist...
Hanged with his own rope, much? :D

BTW on the question "How they have build the pyramids?" he answered "By using numbers".
Like it takes prophetic dreams to figure that out...
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,868
7,884
66
Massachusetts
✟409,619.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You actually counted them? :thumbsup: I just looked at the lots of little panels and figured they'd be enough for that. It's a significant part of the lol factor either way ^_^
I used a simple mathematical algorithm(*) to estimate the number of panels: I counted the number in one row and multiplied by the number of rows. I'm having trouble working out the uncertainty in my estimate though.

(*) I tried publishing my estimate, but one of the reviewers said I really needed to be using a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo for the estimation, and the other said I should be using a Bayesian mixture model, so I went back to bed.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟30,998.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I used a simple mathematical algorithm(*) to estimate the number of panels: I counted the number in one row and multiplied by the number of rows. I'm having trouble working out the uncertainty in my estimate though.

(*) I tried publishing my estimate, but one of the reviewers said I really needed to be using a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo for the estimation, and the other said I should be using a Bayesian mixture model, so I went back to bed.
You officially win this thread.

(I wanted to give you a trophy, but when I googled "funny trophy", the images that came up weren't entirely appropriate for this forum :sorry:)
 
Upvote 0

badtim

Vatican Warlock Assassin
Dec 3, 2010
300
11
✟23,009.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
(*) I tried publishing my estimate, but one of the reviewers said I really needed to be using a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo for the estimation, and the other said I should be using a Bayesian mixture model, so I went back to bed.

don't make me call in my old high school buddy with the phd in econometrics* just to explain your comments, you :p

*he swears he's not really any good, but his phd from uc berkeley and the fact that NOAA created a project and position, specifically for him, right after he was awarded that phd, that is a direct continuation of his dissertation, sayeth otherwise
 
Upvote 0

MorkandMindy

Andrew Yang's Forward Party
Site Supporter
Dec 16, 2006
7,401
785
New Mexico
✟265,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Not far from the truth.

Today I was watching a "prophet" on TV who was claiming he gets dreams about pyramids and how they were build.

His "proof" was he was born on very rare moment when the Sun was for a moment behind Jupiter...

1. When the Sun was behind Jupiter did it get dark here?

2. That means we were further from the Sun than Jupiter so did it get cold?

3. Since Earth is the lightest of these objects most likely it was the location of the Earth that was changed, was his mum watching Dr. Who on TV at the time?

4. He learned all his science off Alan Davies on QI
 
Upvote 0

Blayz

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2007
3,367
231
60
Singapore
✟4,827.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
When I saw that, I lol'd. I also noticed that they did 20 jellybean colors, so with a 95% confidence interval, it would not be amiss that one of them might trigger that.

It was actually a joke about multiple test correction. I have to wonder how many people saw that.

I used a simple mathematical algorithm(*) to estimate the number of panels: I counted the number in one row and multiplied by the number of rows. I'm having trouble working out the uncertainty in my estimate though.

(*) I tried publishing my estimate, but one of the reviewers said I really needed to be using a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo for the estimation, and the other said I should be using a Bayesian mixture model, so I went back to bed.

Try publishing in biology, they'll accept any old methodology when it comes to statistics. I saw (something like) this sentence in a published paper once:

"After applying a multiple test correction, none of our results were significant, so we have not included the corrected p-values in this paper"
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,868
7,884
66
Massachusetts
✟409,619.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Try publishing in biology, they'll accept any old methodology when it comes to statistics. I saw (something like) this sentence in a published paper once:

"After applying a multiple test correction, none of our results were significant, so we have not included the corrected p-values in this paper"
Okay, that is gross. By the way, I do publish in biology, at least if you consider genetics to be biology. In population genetics, at any rate, there is often a great deal of statistical rigor (a lot of statistical theory was invented for population genetics, in fact), and even in the rest of genetics much quality work is done.
 
Upvote 0