Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
???Go back to the counting threads.
in order for you to scientifically state this, then you must accept that each kind of animal has a unique origin and DID NOT arise from a single source.That shouldn't ever happen if evolution is true.
Let's start right there. What is the fossil evidence against evolution? How are the known fossils inconsistent with evolution?
Can you provide a citation?That has been shown not to be true by modern genetics. The fact that your cling to the old model in light of the evidence shows a weakness with evolution theory.
NYT... New York Times?see upload.
please note that this article was written by an evolutionary biologist
attacking the messenger (NY times) is a logical fallacy.NYT... New York Times?
If I were attacking anything, then yes, it would be a logical fallacy. I was, however, just asking a question. My follow up question, is why is such a ground breaking piece of research not in Nature or Science?attacking the messenger (NY times) is a logical fallacy.
i believe boyce is more than qualified to talk about this stuff.
I can not find the drawing, I can find a citation.Can you provide a citation?
And Americans wonder why their country is in trouble.
Ugh. So that's why creationists insist on reducing the whole horse evolution to mere size increase. I get it now. TIL.I can not find the drawing, I can find a citation.
"Take, for instance, the increase in body size which is one of the most striking trends in popular presentations of the horse series. In fact, the increase in size betweenHyracotherium and Equus was by no means gradual, constant, or progressive. An analysis by MacFadden (1987) of 24 ancestral-descendant species pairs revealed that 19 showed body-size increases. However, the remaining 5 lineages showed size decreases. There are even lineages within the horse family tree that show size decreases followed by reversals back to increased size (MacFadden 1984; Webb and Hulbert 1986; Hulbert 1988)." http://www.truthinscience.org.uk/ti...evolution-mainmenu-65/55-horse-evolution.html
Of course the new information means they have to rework the theory. What I am pointing out is how reluctant evolutionists are to let go of the old theory esp when the visual aids are so appealing. Even when they have been shown to not be true. Even Haeckel's embryo drawings are still in use even though it was shown to be far from accurate a long time ago. It reflects peoples mistaken ideas of evolutionary theory.
Erm.. strawman. evolution has zero to do with the manufactured planned Parenthood scandal. There is a thread on this in the news sectionStart with Darwinist evolution teachings which lend support to baby killing/selling their parts.
maybe it has been.If I were attacking anything, then yes, it would be a logical fallacy. I was, however, just asking a question. My follow up question, is why is such a ground breaking piece of research not in Nature or Science?
Erm.. strawman. evolution has zero to do with the manufactured planned Parenthood scandal. There is a thread on this in the news section
Planned Parenthood Falsely Accussed in Video so I won'the go into it here.
If that's true how come most other countries don't have the same problems as the US? the only others who do have the same problems are religious fundamentalist countries in the middle east, which mean religion must somehow skew reality.Start with Darwinist evolution teachings which lend support to baby killing/selling their parts.
Do you think that just because you can imagine a god it's going to somehow stop you being just a sack of chemicals?Of course Darwinist evolution has an influence on the killing of babies and harvesting their parts. In Darwinism, a human has no inherent value other than as a mechanism to pass along genetic information. Killing, and partitioning, the sack of chemicals isn't destroying anything of value.
If that's true how come most other countries don't have the same problems as the US? the only others who do have the same problems are religious fundamentalist countries in the middle east, which mean religion must somehow skew reality.
Why are ALL the backward countries in the world extremely religious? you don't agree? then name one that isn't.
Sure you have.maybe it has been.
maybe it's forbidden to put evolution in a bad light like that.
nonsense you say?
do not ever think like that armoured, because i have been the direct recipient of such a sham.
and it makes me even more determined to expose this garbage for what it is.
I already know why we're in trouble.And Americans wonder why their country is in trouble.
Momentum.If that's true how come most other countries don't have the same problems as the US?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?