Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Science Proves Creation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 72306098" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>Now you are just being silly. If your comments (decribed by you as axioms) were empirical they wouldn't be (couldn't be) axioms. They would be well established observations that were, nevertheless, subject to dismissal by contrary observations.</p><p>As a side note, since you are implictly expressing this purported axiom mathematically, it should be remembered that such axioms are not necessarily <em>true</em>.</p><p></p><p>Your inability to understand that matter and and energy can be infinite in an infinite universe. Since the logic is straightforward, yet you cannot grasp it, I fear it is beyond my pedagogical skills to bring you to understanding.</p><p></p><p>I'm glad you were entertained. I'm sorry you were not educated. (See previous comment regarding pedagogy.)</p><p></p><p>I am not so asserting. I am stating that we do not currently know the finite/infinite status of mass, energy or space. The onus on you is to demonstrate that mass and energy cannot be infinite and this you cannot do with non-axioms. What else do you have?</p><p></p><p></p><p>You have yet to recognise any of the serious flaws identified by myself and others.</p><p></p><p>The wait is over. But the weight of responsibility to present a coherent and cogent argument for your belief remains.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 72306098, member: 234799"] Now you are just being silly. If your comments (decribed by you as axioms) were empirical they wouldn't be (couldn't be) axioms. They would be well established observations that were, nevertheless, subject to dismissal by contrary observations. As a side note, since you are implictly expressing this purported axiom mathematically, it should be remembered that such axioms are not necessarily [I]true[/I]. Your inability to understand that matter and and energy can be infinite in an infinite universe. Since the logic is straightforward, yet you cannot grasp it, I fear it is beyond my pedagogical skills to bring you to understanding. I'm glad you were entertained. I'm sorry you were not educated. (See previous comment regarding pedagogy.) I am not so asserting. I am stating that we do not currently know the finite/infinite status of mass, energy or space. The onus on you is to demonstrate that mass and energy cannot be infinite and this you cannot do with non-axioms. What else do you have? You have yet to recognise any of the serious flaws identified by myself and others. The wait is over. But the weight of responsibility to present a coherent and cogent argument for your belief remains. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Science Proves Creation
Top
Bottom