Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Science leads materialist atheist to reject atheism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="loveofourlord" data-source="post: 76311449" data-attributes="member: 347166"><p>I did, you made fallacious statements that had nothing to do with evolution, and responded showing wh y your wrong. If you can't respond to the refutation then just admit it.</p><p></p><p>If we look at the salamander and snake example, you would think it's impossible for the snake and salamander to evolve to where they were because the snake would die before it was immune, but that's not how it works. You can't look at the finished product that requires perfect precision now and assume it couldn't have gotten there progressively because BOTh evolve at the same time. It's not the plant evolving to feed the animal, it's the animal evolving to feed on it.</p><p></p><p>Again as I refuted your very point with the Italian wall lizard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="loveofourlord, post: 76311449, member: 347166"] I did, you made fallacious statements that had nothing to do with evolution, and responded showing wh y your wrong. If you can't respond to the refutation then just admit it. If we look at the salamander and snake example, you would think it's impossible for the snake and salamander to evolve to where they were because the snake would die before it was immune, but that's not how it works. You can't look at the finished product that requires perfect precision now and assume it couldn't have gotten there progressively because BOTh evolve at the same time. It's not the plant evolving to feed the animal, it's the animal evolving to feed on it. Again as I refuted your very point with the Italian wall lizard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Science leads materialist atheist to reject atheism
Top
Bottom