B
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I figured there was no need to post this in the main forum, as I know that most liberal Lutherans believe that salvation is possible for non-Christians. I am curious as to whether Modernism has changed the conservative Lutheran view of salvation, like it has the RCC view. Do most WELS and LC-MS Lutherans insist that only Christians will be saved or do most believe that Jews, Muslims and others who love God and their neighbor still have a chance at salvation? Do those who insist that only Christians will be saved still fell that there is a chance that God might save some who never hear the Gospel message and yet lead lives of love or are they lost despite the fact that they never get to hear the message of Jesus?
In light of Paul's words in Romans 10, along with what Filo has quoted above, I have always understood there to be three kinds of people:
Those who have heard the Gospel and acknowledge it by faith. They are saved.
Those who have heard the Gospel and actively reject it. They are lost.
Those who have never heard. They are lost.
just curious - if someone lives in a tribe way out in the middle of absolute nowhere, some place that doesn't even show up on maps, and they have never heard, because nobody has ever been to that island, or wherever, to teach them, how can they be lost, when they don't know any different?
Those that have not heard are lost? I thought the Lutheran belief is that no one is predestined to damnation. If they never hear the message, they do not have faith, therefore they were always condemned. What am I missing here?
I'm sorry, I know I shouldn't post in this section but the topic intrigued me. I'm not going to debate anything, I just want further clarification.
Those that have not heard are lost? I thought the Lutheran belief is that no one is predestined to damnation. If they never hear the message, they do not have faith, therefore they were always condemned. What am I missing here?
just curious - if someone lives in a tribe way out in the middle of absolute nowhere, some place that doesn't even show up on maps, and they have never heard, because nobody has ever been to that island, or wherever, to teach them, how can they be lost, when they don't know any different?
Not only are they lost but, "There will be many who say Lord, Lord... and he will say I never knew you!" So, there are many who think they are saved who will not be.
Please don't start those circular double-negative type arguments, Mum. Yes, they are damned unless the Lord condescends to grant them salvation through Christ. However, since they have never heard the word, that's biblically speaking, unlikely. Like the Revrand quoted, 'the Lord will have mercy on whom he will...' there we must leave it. By the by, there really isn't anywhere left that doesn't show up on "the maps."
Speaking of which, this is why all the anthropoligists' insistance on not 'polluting' these aboriginie peoples with 'Western thinking and religions' is so dangerous. Listening to these people and the governments that back them is damning whole nations of peoples. Then again, there are some places that the evil one has locked down as his strongholds (like the Muslim countries). Unless the Lord breaks down the barriers and sends us in to help these peoples, we are fated do descry their loss to the Church.Just as the people who live across the street from the church I attend will likely be damned. They never go to church, don't belong to one, don't want to, and likely never will. The vast majority of humanity seems to be headed for Hell.
Please don't start those circular double-negative type arguments, Mum.
i wasn't starting a circular double-negative type argument. i was genuinely asking a legitimate question - this is what had been taught to me in the churches my mother dragged me to growing up - that if you haven't heard, you can't reject, and therefore, you would not be condemned (or something like that) - it's a remnant from my past religious upbringing.
reading the responses that followed, and talking to Rev tonight about it, explaining it to me, now it makes sense, and i get it.
please don't accuse me of something i was not doing.
Studeclunker - I am curious... Do you agree or disagree with my fear that the bulk of baptized Christians are in danger of going to Hell?
I am not Studeclunker
The only we fear we should have is: Am I as a baptized Christian concerned about going to hell? But if I look to Christ, not myself, then the question no longer applies.
The rest involves teaching, teaching, and teaching.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?