Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I haven't really discussed it with other Adventists. To me it's more of a common sense thing since Mary said she needed a Savior and she accepted Christ as the Messiah that God promised.
Accepting Christ as your Savior and following Him is the definition of a Christian.
The Bible says Christ became the author of eternal salvation to all those that obey Him, and that none would enter the Kingdom of Heaven without believing in Him.
If anyone else has a definition of what being a Christian is I welcome you to post it here. At least in my mind, that's exactly what it is. Accepting Him as the Savior the Father promised, and picking up our crosses to follow Him.
All I know is I was in a discussion with someone else and you're suddenly asking me to discuss with YOU reasonably?
So you never addressed any posts to me and I never had anything to say, I am just an intrusion into a private conversation on a public forum, is that what your defense is going to be. The Subject was how you interpret the reference to the sabbath in Matthew 24, pray that your flight will not be on the sabbath or that you are pregnant of nursing.
I should not have to keep reminding you to stay on topic but clearly you are eager to talk about anything but the subject. Fine have it your way.
No, my "defense" is that I answered your question more than once and not everything I said was directed at you. I was in a conversation with someone else.
I have said, repeatedly <knocking on the glass....is this thing on?> that I believe the verse in Matthew is referring to the fall of Jerusalem. I don't know how to say it any plainer than that.
Okay then, what is a Christian? Is it not someone that follows Christ and His teachings? Just because someone was born a Jew doesn't mean they have to die one.Lainie- I believe your definition of what constitutes a "Christian" is correct. Even Abraham of old could logically be called a Christian. After all-it's always been Jesus that is the God of the OT! Paul says that it was the CHRIST who led the Israelites from Egypt thru the wilderness and on to the promised land.
(1Co 10:2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat; 4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.)
So for some to try to define a "Christian" as someone only AFTER the name appears in the bible, is not seeing the big picture.
So for some to try to define a "Christian" as someone only AFTER the name appears in the bible, is not seeing the big picture.
I understand the SDA belief about salvation. I was specifically wondering about whether it was common for SDAs to believe there were Christians before the death and resurrection of Jesus.
RC said:Well so what, I don't know of any Christian who does not think the verses referred to Jerusalem siege.
I'm sorry, I completely missed this post when I was in here earlier.
I don't know what's "common" for Adventists. I'm speaking merely from the observation that Christ didn't have to die and resurrect before He had followers that recognized Him as the promised Messiah.
Does that answer your question?
You said you couldn't understand why some Adventists felt those verses were talking about the end of the earth. Now you're saying you don't know any Christian that feels that way?
Why was Christ concerned about practices of the Sabbath at all if He knew it was going to be nailed to the cross with Him?
Why would people that didn't believe Christ was the Messiah listen to His prohecy anyway? Some guy claiming to be the Son of God. They didn't listen to Him about other things, so how did they all know when to flee and decide to listen this time if they didn't believe in Him?
I totally admit that I've rambled a few times. I don't understand the whole hangup on Jew vs Christian when ANYONE can accept Christ as their Savior and become a Christian, so I had to get a little side-tracked to address that issue.
But speaking of not answering questions...you've skipped a few of mine. Did the WORD "Christian" have to be mentioned in the Bible before someone could actually become one?
I've also asked you what you think the definition of a Christian is.
http://www.christianforums.com/showpost.php?p=33280948&postcount=6No that would be totally out of the context of what He was saying in that verse. The only way you can get that is by reading something into his words. A Christian is one who follows Jesus Christ like the Apostle Paul who is the one who wrote the verse about not judging people about festivals or new moons or sabbath days. Clearly Paul did not feel it was necessary to carry on all Jewish traditions even though Jesus practiced them during his time on earth. Otherwise he would not have been so hard on the Judizers.
RC, I have another question for you. You go to an Adventist church every Sabbath. I'd like to know the reason you do that.
If I'm not reaching out to people in the right way and you know of a better way, I am really asking you to please share your view here.
Of course she did. She was a Jew!Luke 23:56 - And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments; and rested the sabbath day according to the commandment.
You mentioned that it was Mary's custom to keep the Sabbath day commandment, but even the verse we're discussing makes it clear that it was a commandment and not just a custom.
She had long been a Christian by this time. She followed Christ and His teachings, and that is exactly what a Christian is.
I Have a question, wasn't Paul a Roman Citizen?
RC said:Well taking A&P you should have learned this by now. Words have meanings. And a word does not have a meaning until the word is created and used with a meaning. You will find as you study history that there were several types of Christians as well as several types of Jews. Thus they have further names created to identify their postitions as well such as gnostic Christians. There were Ebionites who were Jews who accepted Jesus as Messiah but also maintained that all Jewish laws and traditions be maintained. The point is words have meaning.
RC said:Yes, because before that they were called followers of the Way, disciples or apostles of simply people who recognized Jesus as rabbi, teacher or master. Christian is a word used to describe those followers. The people could certainly follow Jesus but they were not called Christians.
RC said:There are a number of reasons, there are also a number of churches with Saturday evening services here also, if going to a church on saturday was the issue I could go to them. But it is not. Reason for going to a church have many factors and it is pretty much never just about what day the church meets. As you could fulfill the rest requirments at home and you could meet with other believers at any number of times. We don't live the way they did in the pre printing press days when you had to go to the synagogue to hear scriptures read to you because there were precious few copies.
Possibly one of the biggest problems in Adventism today is this concept that an Adventist must be in complete agreement with what Adventism has traditionally believed. In the whole history of Judeo-Christian religion there is one thing that stays the same and that is that the religions change. We as Adventist came out of a movement that said we don't agree with what all these other churches are teaching. But now if you don't agree with the theology of the 1800's now we have traditional Adventist that will call you dishonest.You are an Adventist when you want to debate in this forum, but very non-committal when it comes to defending any of our beliefs. I think that's very dishonest, Sir. It's also very obvious, just so you know.
Possibly one of the biggest problems in Adventism today is this concept that an Adventist must be in complete agreement with what Adventism has traditionally believed. In the whole history of Judeo-Christian religion there is one thing that stays the same and that is that the religions change. We as Adventist came out of a movement that said we don't agree with what all these other churches are teaching. But now if you don't agree with the theology of the 1800's now we have traditional Adventist that will call you dishonest.
Is it dishonest to state what you believe? No, is it dishonest to disagree with certain church doctrines? No, so what is dishonest with what I have been saying? The only possible answer is that I am a SDA who disagrees with Traditional SDA's. That is why we came up with the name Progressive SDA's so that we can actually progress in our knowledge rather then wallow in the ruts of traditional Adventism. Which frankly I can't see the attraction to the ruts, I mean when I discuss things with the traditional SDA's they usually become incredibly defensive and emotional and flee from rational thought.
Possibly one of the biggest problems in Adventism today is this concept that an Adventist must be in complete agreement with what Adventism has traditionally believed. In the whole history of Judeo-Christian religion there is one thing that stays the same and that is that the religions change. We as Adventist came out of a movement that said we don't agree with what all these other churches are teaching. But now if you don't agree with the theology of the 1800's now we have traditional Adventist that will call you dishonest.
Is it dishonest to state what you believe? No, is it dishonest to disagree with certain church doctrines? No, so what is dishonest with what I have been saying? The only possible answer is that I am a SDA who disagrees with Traditional SDA's. That is why we came up with the name Progressive SDA's so that we can actually progress in our knowledge rather then wallow in the ruts of traditional Adventism. Which frankly I can't see the attraction to the ruts, I mean when I discuss things with the traditional SDA's they usually become incredibly defensive and emotional and flee from rational thought.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?