Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Rule Of Law Ends In Boston Archdiocese
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evangelion" data-source="post: 514243" data-attributes="member: 5511"><p>VOW -</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've made my point, and I'm happy with the result. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then you need to read them again.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not the point, though. The point is that, at this early stage, the Emperor was <em>still</em> the head of the Church, by default. Nobody even thought to ask the bishop of Rome for <em>his</em> opinion. (Why would they? As one bishop among others, he just wasn't very important...)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, he has presented some quotes from which he has extrapolated this extraordinary conclusion, and I have addressed all of them specifically. (Please also notice my citations from Catholic scholars who reject Isshinwhat's claim.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He's already posted them, and I've shown that they don't say what he needs them to say. Now he's simply explaining why he <em>believes</em> that they say what he needs them to say. (Which is interesting, insofar as it explains his rationale - but irrelevant, insofar as it adds nothing to the argument.)</p><p></p><p>There's really nothing left to talk about. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evangelion, post: 514243, member: 5511"] VOW - I've made my point, and I'm happy with the result. :) Then you need to read them again. That's not the point, though. The point is that, at this early stage, the Emperor was [i]still[/i] the head of the Church, by default. Nobody even thought to ask the bishop of Rome for [i]his[/i] opinion. (Why would they? As one bishop among others, he just wasn't very important...) No, he has presented some quotes from which he has extrapolated this extraordinary conclusion, and I have addressed all of them specifically. (Please also notice my citations from Catholic scholars who reject Isshinwhat's claim.) He's already posted them, and I've shown that they don't say what he needs them to say. Now he's simply explaining why he [i]believes[/i] that they say what he needs them to say. (Which is interesting, insofar as it explains his rationale - but irrelevant, insofar as it adds nothing to the argument.) There's really nothing left to talk about. :cool: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Rule Of Law Ends In Boston Archdiocese
Top
Bottom