Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Rule Of Law Ends In Boston Archdiocese
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="isshinwhat" data-source="post: 513367" data-attributes="member: 2132"><p>First, I must apologize to Susan for responding in a manner that allowed her thread to be hijacked. </p><p></p><p>Second: </p><p></p><p>The statement that it is <strong>necessary</strong> for all churches to agree with the Roman Church because of her "pre- eminent <strong>authority</strong>" leads me to believe that there is indeed Patristic proof prior to 315 A.D. regarding the Primacy of Rome, and <em>by default</em> the Bishop of Rome who is the shepard of that Church. </p><p></p><p> </p><p>-------- </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>The Chair of Peter is the office of the Papacy, which is held by the Bishop of Rome, thus by stating that one must question if he is in the Church at all if he does not hold "fast to this oneness of Peter," the author is clearly stating his belief in the "primacy of the Church of Rome." </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Goodnight all, and I'll be back later in the week. </p><p></p><p>Neal</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="isshinwhat, post: 513367, member: 2132"] First, I must apologize to Susan for responding in a manner that allowed her thread to be hijacked. Second: The statement that it is [b]necessary[/b] for all churches to agree with the Roman Church because of her "pre- eminent [b]authority[/b]" leads me to believe that there is indeed Patristic proof prior to 315 A.D. regarding the Primacy of Rome, and [i]by default[/i] the Bishop of Rome who is the shepard of that Church. -------- The Chair of Peter is the office of the Papacy, which is held by the Bishop of Rome, thus by stating that one must question if he is in the Church at all if he does not hold "fast to this oneness of Peter," the author is clearly stating his belief in the "primacy of the Church of Rome." Goodnight all, and I'll be back later in the week. Neal [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Rule Of Law Ends In Boston Archdiocese
Top
Bottom