• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Roll call (who are the Seventh-day Adventists in da house)?

MidnightCry

Regular Member
Mar 23, 2006
435
9
south dakota
✟23,122.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hi Lainie!!

And a big hello to my fellow Seventh-Day Adventists :wave: !!

I consider myself a true Seventh-Day Adventist and I believe in the Fundamental Beliefs of our church.

(Actually I had no idea there was any other kind of adventist, such as a progressive or evangelical adventist until I came to this forum.) I don't understand their beliefs exactly, and I don't understand how they can still call themselves Seventh-Day Adventists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mva1985
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,235
512
✟559,731.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hi all,

I'd like to get a list of the Seventh-day Adventists here that agree with what our church teaches and proudly wear the name "Seventh-day Adventist"!

Do you agree with the Fundamental Beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist church, if so, say it loud!

Come one, come all. Just say hi. :)


A good reason to have a roll call is also to use it in presenting our request to get our name "Seventh-day Adventist" put back. We will be putting together our case so we can change the name of our forum to "Seventh-day Adventist" and we need to have a list of the lay group holding to church doctrine and sharing those beliefs with nonSDAs on behalf of the SDA church. So if you are a member that loves and hold to the beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist church and want the name "Seventh-day Adventist" back up, please put your name on the roll call ......
 
Upvote 0
I'll go on record with this much - I believe in the Seventh-day Adventism that was during the life of Ellen G. White, not the "new movement" "structure" of this quote, but its "our" "remnant church":
The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed.The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new organization would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of the new movement. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but God being removed, they would place their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest would sweep away the structure.
Selected Messages Book 1 (1958), page 204, paragraph 2
Just say no to the red, and yes to the blue. It has happened already. Thanks to Froom, Anderson, Read, Unruh, Figuhr, and predecessors (H. Camden Lacey, A.W. Spalding).

“We have no doubt, neither have we had a doubt for years, that the doctrines we hold today are present truth, and that we are nearing the judgment.” {E. G. White, Testimonies Vol. 2, p. 355. 1870}

Appearing from 1889-1914 in the SDA Yearbooks:
“As elsewhere stated, Seventh-day Adventists have no creed but the Bible; but they hold to certain well-defined points of faith, for which they feel prepared to give a reason "to every man that asketh" them.... (points of faith)

(Note: in 1872 a statement of beliefs was penned largely by James White in a 14-page leaflet entitled “A Declaration of the Fundamental Principles of the Seventh-day Adventists”, and it first appeared in the Signs of the Times issue of 1874. {The Living Witness, 1959, Pacific Press Publishing Association, pp. 1, 2} From there it was incorporated into the Yearbooks of 1889-1914. But, between the years of 1915-1930 there was no ‘Statement of Beliefs’ appearing in our Yearbooks. What happened in those years?)

“We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us, and His teaching in our past history.” {E. G. White, Life Sketches, p. 196}
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
85
San Marcos, CA
✟70,664.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Consider me to have stood up and been counted as an SDA who holds to the doctrines and beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist church including the 28 Fundamental Beliefs as stated by the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventist.

Your brother in Christ,
Doc
 
  • Like
Reactions: mva1985
Upvote 0

oldsage

Veteran
Nov 4, 2005
1,307
70
56
Pinellas Park, FL
✟1,833.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
A good reason to have a roll call is also to use it in presenting our request to the GCs Office of the General Counsel to allow us to use the name "Seventh-day Adventist". We will be putting together our case to bring to them to get approval so we can change the name of our forum to "Seventh-day Adventist" and we need to show that we are indeed a lay group holding to church doctrine and sharing those beliefs with nonSDAs on behalf of the SDA church. So if you are a member that loves and hold to the beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist church and want the name "Seventh-day Adventist" back up, please put your name on the roll call ......
You know red, in the strictest sense I am an adventist seeing how I believe in the soon advent of Jesus, but I am not sda. So, it seems the naming convention kills the uniqueness of the sda message
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
You know red, in the strictest sense I am an adventist seeing how I believe in the soon advent of Jesus, but I am not sda. So, it seems the naming convention kills the uniqueness of the sda message

I think you should be declared an honorary member since I'm "THIS CLOSE" to winning my free toaster by getting you to join our church. :)
 
Upvote 0

PROPHECYKID

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2007
5,982
528
37
The isle of spice
Visit site
✟118,684.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm Present. So don't out an A by my name. I say the same as DOC.

Consider me to have stood up and been counted as an SDA who holds to the doctrines and beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist church including the 28 Fundamental Beliefs as stated by the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventist.

Well put!!
 
Upvote 0

freeindeed2

In Christ We Are FREE!
Feb 1, 2007
31,130
20,046
56
A mile high.
✟87,197.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My only loyalty is with Christ alone, and Him crucified. I completely support the Gospel as taught in Scripture by the apostles. My only official church membership is in the SDA church where I pastored for over 10 years. However, I do consider being a member of the family of God through adoption in Jesus Christ as being of eternal importance. But by human standards I do belong to the SDA denominationalism community.

I would appreciate my name being added to the list of members on CF who have membership and pastoral experience in the SDA church.

In CHRIST alone...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mva1985
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsage
You know red, in the strictest sense I am an adventist seeing how I believe in the soon advent of Jesus, but I am not sda. So, it seems the naming convention kills the uniqueness of the sda message

I think you should be declared an honorary member since I'm "THIS CLOSE" to winning my free toaster by getting you to join our church. :)


At our church the joke was that we should give you a plane ticket when you came up out of the baptismal tank because we had so many people coming and going!
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
My only loyalty is with Christ alone, and Him crucified. I completely support the Gospel as taught in Scripture by the apostles. My only official church membership is in the SDA church where I pastored for over 10 years. However, I do consider being a member of the family of God through adoption in Jesus Christ as being of eternal importance. But by human standards I do belong to the SDA denominationalism community.

I would appreciate my name being added to the list of members on CF who have membership and pastoral experience in the SDA church.

In CHRIST alone...

That's not news tao. I announced that I did not agree with SDA theology from my very first post here. It's the very reason I resigned in the first place. That I disagree with you has much to do with your responses to me.

In CHRIST alone...

I see a discrepancy and a problem here.
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,235
512
✟559,731.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You know red, in the strictest sense I am an adventist seeing how I believe in the soon advent of Jesus, but I am not sda. So, it seems the naming convention kills the uniqueness of the sda message

But if you believe in the Sabbath, that goes a bit further than just Adventist. Do you feel if we kept it as just 'Adventist' it would be more open to people or would it confuse people coming in?
 
Upvote 0