Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, you said "You won't show me because you can't", that says I am unable to show which isn't true, the truth is I'm unwilling to show you. I think you've proven plenty.I said you wouldn't point it out, guaranteed. You did not, proving my point. Unfortunately, many of my left leaning friends make arguments based on what they assumed was said rather than on what was actually said. This would appear to me another incidence of such.
Out of curiosity, if you did not enlist, how did you serve? Isn't the current enlistment age 41 or 42?I served, but I never said I enlisted
Then that should settle the discussion as to why I am not there now
Agreed
The truth is you CAN'T because you would have to show something that isn't there. End of storyNo, you said "You won't show me because you can't", that says I am unable to show which isn't true, the truth is I'm unwilling to show you. I think you've proven plenty.
Think about it.
I will assume no answer will be forthcoming before the secondcoming.What duty have you done? Will you explain?
Thank You for your service, MachThe discussion is about military service
I served in the 101st Airborne. As I said, I earned my right to speak on military issues.
Why don't you just tell the guy you were drafted and are too old to enlist?Like I said, think about!
No it wouldn't. Not everyone is eligible to enlist
Yes, but we are talking about someone who was once enlisted already, so reenlistment options would be the term.
Who would that someone be?
It's in the thread, go back and read it.
If it's there, show me. You won't show me because you can't. Guaranteed.
Nice try, but it's already in the thread, if you don't care to read through it, I can't help you.
No, you said "You won't show me because you can't", that says I am unable to show which isn't true, the truth is I'm unwilling to show you. I think you've proven plenty.
The truth is you CAN'T because you would have to show something that isn't there. End of story
Finally, my point is proven that you cannot justify your comments because you referred to something that does not exist in the threadWhy don't you just tell the guy you were drafted and are too old to enlist?
Maybe, but you still can't come out and say "I was drafted" and/or "I am too old to enlist now". Wonder why you refuse to do such things. I guess it's because you enjoy the game too much.Finally, my point is proven that you cannot justify your comments because you referred to something that does not exist in the thread
I was indeed drafted which means that I am indeed too old to enlist. And I didn't create the point. The point was created by those who made assertioons based on assumptionsMaybe, but you still can't come out and say "I was drafted" and/or "I am too old to enlist now". Wonder why you refuse to do such things. I guess it's because you enjoy the game too much.
It's rather easy for one to prove a point they've created which has nothing to do with a conversation.
Maybe this post will clarify it for you
In other words, Rangel proposed a draft bill not wanting it to pass, but just to make a point. that's playing politics
Should we make the fullest possible committment or should we make whatever committment is necessary. The fullest possible committment would mean that every 18-30 year old would do a stint in the military. That is a massive logistical concern. Would you really propose that?
Proposing a draft bill that he doesn't want to pass is not my idea of making a decision that Bush is afraid to make.
You do, as I am sure, comprehend that people make assumptions because you rarely answer questions.I was indeed drafted which means that I am indeed too old to enlist. And I didn't create the point. The point was created by those who made assertioons based on assumptions
Really? Someone asked why you couldn't reenlist, you said to figure it out, you didn't give a straight answer, in fact you didn't give any answer. Based on this answer, perhaps the concept is beyond your comprehension.No I don't and that certainly isn't the case here
Actually, the conversation started quite some time before that question, for those who followed the discussionReally? Someone asked why you couldn't reenlist, you said to figure it out, you didn't give a straight answer, in fact you didn't give any answer. Based on this answer, perhaps the concept is beyond your comprehension.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?