• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Removing the laws of God- what does it really mean?

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married


Thank you for posting that list - very helpful.

In Rom 3:31 - "do we then make VOID the LAW of God by our faith? God forbid! in fact we establish the Law".

Where as Paul reminds us in Eph 6:1-2 that law "established" includes the TEN where the "first commandment with a promise" is the 5th commandment in that special unit of TEN.

In Romans 8:4-9 we find that the lost "do not subject themselves to the Law of God neither indeed CAN they" - as noted below.

4 so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5 For those who are in accord with the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who are in accord with the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. 6 For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, 7 because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so, 8 and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
9 However, you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him
 
Upvote 0

Religiot

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2020
1,046
384
Private
✟29,006.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Think about it a little more.
With respect, I didn't think about it at all: I just defer to what God says--I'll post the reference further below.
When Adam ate, he then knew evil. Not good from evil.
Adam didn't know either, but ate for another reason.
Had Adam and Eve been allowed to stay in the garden, and continue to eat, then they would have grown in the knowledge of good and evil - becoming wiser.
That theory is contrary to what God says.
However, since they were removed, he no longer had access to it. Just like he no longer had access to the tree of life - and because of that, died
Yes, in part, for the denial of the tree of life did prevent the ongoing of his life.
The damage was done though, and now the lie continues to remain - mankind thinking they can be like God knowing good from evil, wise in their own eyes.
Man does indeed know good from evil--wisdom in his own eyes is just a result of evil, not the knowledge thereof, but it's effect.

What God says about this matter:

"And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life." --Genesis 3:22-24

Satan is a liar and there is no truth in him.
Yes, Satan is indeed a liar, but more specifically, the father of it, yet you failed to see his lie in the garden, for in all that he said, he lied but in one thing alone, when he said, "Ye shall not surely die."

This is the lie that pervades all religion, to this day, the immortality of man, presupposed, with or without God: the first lie remains, unchanged, throughout the ages. --the Dragon succeeds in deceiving the whole world, but the very elect of God, for they have been preserved from his power to twist God's word, thus it is impossible for them to be carried away. Amen.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Mk 2:27; Gal 4:8-11; Col 2:16--where the Sabbath was a shadow of the things to come, but the reality is found in Christ, not in a day of the week.

The NT command is not to forsake meeting together (Heb 11:25).

No text says "The Sabbath was a shadow" of anything.

Mark 2:27 "the Sabbath was MADE for MANKIND"
Col 2:16-17 says the feasts, festivals... and sabbaths (the annual sabbaths/feasts of Lev 23) were shadows.

16 So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, 17 which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.(NKJV)

16 Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a sabbath day— 17 things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ.(NASB 1995)

16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

All of the annual Sabbath days of Lev 23 were given with animal sacrifice liturgy pointing to the sacrifice of Christ -- a shadows, at their inception. Not so with the Ex 20:11, Gen 2:1-3 Sabbath day (the Sabbath day) - given before sin entered in the world and it was included in the TEN.
 
Upvote 0

Toro

Oh, Hello!
Jan 27, 2012
24,221
12,451
You don't get to stalk me. :|
✟354,351.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Anyone saying that the law no longer natters would concern me, for Christ IS the fulfillment of the law.

While true it means we are no longer bound by the black and white of the law as the Pharisees so loved for it allowed for the inside of their cup to remain filthy. We ARE still bound to the spirit of the law, that we can only follow if He abides in us and we in Him. It means that the inside must be clean, allowing no loopholes for me to WANT to continue living in filth. That though falling to sin will happen, I do not joyfully return to commit them.
 
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
15,941
3,986
✟385,790.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
So we have the ancient churches firmly and consistently upholding the ten commandments even as they understood the commandment regarding sabbath in a new way and observed it differently from the Jews. All of the law was regarded in a new way for that matter. And this understanding involving the sabbath was also supported by writings of early church fathers and other sources. And then, as the doctrine of Sola Scriptura took hold some fifteen centuries later, we have a variety of opinions on the matter, with some, as this thread demonstrates, thinking the law doesn't even need to have a place at all in the Christian faith based on their interpretation while others may pipe up and proclaim, "I read the bible, and I know that we're supposed to observe the sabbath as was originally done, regardless of how the church may or may not have done things back in the day. Meanwhile those older churches just keep chugging along with the same beliefs and practices that were handed down, addressing and clarifying some beliefs at council at times as the need arises.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,415
5,514
USA
✟704,985.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
There is more than one Sabbath in the Bible. There is the moral Sabbath that God established at creation before sin Genesis 2:3 and than wrote in stone Exodus 20:8-11. God said His Sabbath is a perpetual covenant, meaning it can not be broken ever. The Sabbath you are referring to in Colossians is the ceremonial Sabbath(s) the Sabbath festivals, if you read Colossians 2:16 its all about food and drink and there is nothing in God’s commandments about food or drink Exodus 20. God asked us to REMEMBER His Sabbath which is why on the New Earth all will worship Him each and every Saturday. Isaiah 66:23.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It's not about having a say in the terms. It's about having conditions required to keep the covenant in force.

And, actually, the Mosaic Covenant it is a two-way street (Ex 19:5-8).
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Clare73 said:
You think all Christians are disqualified from being in the faith?
Isaiah 53:6
All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.

It's in my sig file near the bottom.
Non-responsive. . .wanna' answer the question?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,177
9,219
65
Martinez
✟1,145,670.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But it is not the basis and condition of the Mosaic Covenant, as was the Decalogue.
And....the Mosaic Covenant was filled through Jesus Christ of Nazareth. We are now in the New Covenant through regeneration by the Holy Spirit given to all who believe in Him. All other covenants are obsolete.
 
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,542
North Carolina
✟345,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No text says "The Sabbath was a shadow" of anything.

1) Mark 2:27 "the Sabbath was MADE for MANKIND"
2) Col 2:16-17 says the feasts, festivals... and sabbaths (the annual sabbaths/feasts of Lev 23) were shadows.
So you're saying instead of calling it Passover (Unleavened Bread), or Feast of Weeks, or Feast of Trumpets, or Feast of Tabernacles,
they just called them Sabbaths and, therefore, Col 2:16 does not refer to the weekly Sabbath?

But NT testimony of the practice of assembling on Sunday (Ac 20:7; 1Co 16:2; Rev 1:10) does not support that.
were given with animal sacrifice liturgy pointing to the sacrifice of Christ -- a shadows, at their inception.Not so with the Ex 20:11,
Gen 2:1-3 Sabbath day (the Sabbath day) - given before sin entered in the world and it was included in the TEN.
The Sabbath was not given to man for rest in Ge 2:1-3. And you left out. . .

3) Heb 4:1-11, v.9, where the Sabbath was a shadow of the things to come (Sabbath-rest in Christ for the people of God, v.9), while
the reality (rest from our own works to save ourselves, v.10) is found in Christ, not in a day of the week.

The Sabbath is fulfilled in Christ (Heb 4:9-11).

Christian records from the first century (Didache) show Sunday as the day of assembly.
And that record would have been from the first transmission from the apostles (those taught by the apostles).



There is more than one Sabbath in the Bible. There is the moral Sabbath that God established at creation before sin Genesis 2:3

The Sabbath was not given to man for rest in Ge 2:1-3.

See the above.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,240
8,529
Canada
✟888,878.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
According to the bible, Truth sets free, The words of God are Truth, and Jesus is the incarnation of Truth.

When the rebellion of consuming the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil is called Truth, this illustrates why the church is in decline.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,240
8,529
Canada
✟888,878.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
The letter of James illustrates that these works consist of not showing favoritism, judging with mercy, and living by the law of liberty i.e. treating others as Jesus treated you.

Following the dead letter of the law, results in dead faith.
 
Upvote 0

Religiot

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2020
1,046
384
Private
✟29,006.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
When the rebellion of consuming the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil is called Truth, this illustrates why the church is in decline.
I've quoted your comment mostly to preserve it for others to see; cause what you've just said in response to me, is so absurd as to put me in complete disbelief.

How you are able, to say what you've just said, and then to post it publicly as a response to what I said, is beyond me.

No one has ever twisted a post of mine to such a bewildering degree.

Truly, I'm astonished at your attempt to twist what I said into something I, nor anyone here, could ever mean.

If you hate my posts to this extent, why not just ignore me?
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,240
8,529
Canada
✟888,878.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
So I am being accused of what the above post is doing. Bizarre.
 
Upvote 0

Religiot

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2020
1,046
384
Private
✟29,006.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The letter of James illustrates that these works consist of not showing favoritism, judging with mercy, and living by the law of liberty i.e. treating others as Jesus treated you.

Following the dead letter of the law, results in dead faith.
I strongly recommend you bother to read my other posts on this thread before you continue commenting, because you have yet to touch on anything that contradicts what I've already said.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,240
8,529
Canada
✟888,878.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I strongly recommend you bother to read my other posts on this thread before you continue commenting, because you have yet to touch on anything that contradicts what I've already said.
I am replying to your reply to my post, I see no need to read the other posts of someone who is hostile towards me.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,240
8,529
Canada
✟888,878.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
The only things bizarre are your responses.

Why not address the doctrine I've proved by the scriptures instead?
I'm not reading previous posts.

furthermore, your interpretation =/= the scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

Religiot

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2020
1,046
384
Private
✟29,006.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I am replying to your reply to my post, I see no need to read the other posts of someone who is hostile towards me.
I'm not interested in playing along with your pretense of hostility, I'm here to prove what is true by the scriptures to the glory of God, period.
 
Upvote 0