Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniel9v9" data-source="post: 76781984" data-attributes="member: 387848"><p>I explain this in my other posts.</p><p></p><p>In short, to view this as a matter of me imposing my own moral opinion upon others is problematic, because any law that has to do with morals or ethical questions has someone's beliefs imposed upon others. This is not a religion vs politics debate, but it's a clash of a spectrum of beliefs and worldviews. And I think if we can at least agree on that murder is wrong, then we can reason from there.</p><p></p><p>So, to repeat what I wrote earlier:</p><p></p><p>Can we agree on that murder is wrong? If yes, let's then consider this:</p><p></p><p>Is the unborn alive or not alive, scientifically speaking?</p><p>What species is the being in the womb?</p><p></p><p>If the answer to the above is "yes" and "human", then we must confess that we are dealing with a human life, and we should care for that child as we care for all life.</p><p></p><p>Beyond this, here's what I would like people to reflect on:</p><p></p><p>1. Any pro-abortion argument that can be applied to a 2 year old is not a good argument.</p><p>2. Who decides what qualifies as a human right?</p><p>3. It is possible to care for mothers and children alike.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniel9v9, post: 76781984, member: 387848"] I explain this in my other posts. In short, to view this as a matter of me imposing my own moral opinion upon others is problematic, because any law that has to do with morals or ethical questions has someone's beliefs imposed upon others. This is not a religion vs politics debate, but it's a clash of a spectrum of beliefs and worldviews. And I think if we can at least agree on that murder is wrong, then we can reason from there. So, to repeat what I wrote earlier: Can we agree on that murder is wrong? If yes, let's then consider this: Is the unborn alive or not alive, scientifically speaking? What species is the being in the womb? If the answer to the above is "yes" and "human", then we must confess that we are dealing with a human life, and we should care for that child as we care for all life. Beyond this, here's what I would like people to reflect on: 1. Any pro-abortion argument that can be applied to a 2 year old is not a good argument. 2. Who decides what qualifies as a human right? 3. It is possible to care for mothers and children alike. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
Top
Bottom