Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zippy2006" data-source="post: 76781780" data-attributes="member: 342410"><p>It's not irrelevant if you understand where the United States came from, how our legal system was devised, and other general historical conditions of our country. Blackstone may be the most cited authority in the entirety of the history of our courts. In any case, only the first half of that article is intent on using Blackstone as an early legal context.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Apparently courts which overturn their own decisions aren't infallible, and that should answer your question.</p><p></p><p>But the point is that your claim was false. It's not at all crystal clear.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is a horrendously bad non-argument, and it is the best thing I have seen from the left all week.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zippy2006, post: 76781780, member: 342410"] It's not irrelevant if you understand where the United States came from, how our legal system was devised, and other general historical conditions of our country. Blackstone may be the most cited authority in the entirety of the history of our courts. In any case, only the first half of that article is intent on using Blackstone as an early legal context. Apparently courts which overturn their own decisions aren't infallible, and that should answer your question. But the point is that your claim was false. It's not at all crystal clear. That is a horrendously bad non-argument, and it is the best thing I have seen from the left all week. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
Top
Bottom