Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BNR32FAN" data-source="post: 76780905" data-attributes="member: 401065"><p>The baby’s status is completely relevant to determine whether or not murder is being committed. Let’s just get the facts on the table here. Less than 1% of abortions occur as a result of rape or incest. 1-3% occur due to medical complications. So the other 96% occur because people are just being irresponsible and would rather kill an unwanted child rather than face the consequences for their actions. So no that option needs to be eliminated to protect the child’s right to live as opposed to the inconvenience the irresponsible mother has to endure as a consequence for her poor choices and judgment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BNR32FAN, post: 76780905, member: 401065"] The baby’s status is completely relevant to determine whether or not murder is being committed. Let’s just get the facts on the table here. Less than 1% of abortions occur as a result of rape or incest. 1-3% occur due to medical complications. So the other 96% occur because people are just being irresponsible and would rather kill an unwanted child rather than face the consequences for their actions. So no that option needs to be eliminated to protect the child’s right to live as opposed to the inconvenience the irresponsible mother has to endure as a consequence for her poor choices and judgment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
Top
Bottom