Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark46" data-source="post: 76780842" data-attributes="member: 257078"><p>???</p><p></p><p>It is the right to privacy that SCOTUS has rejected in the latest case. As Thomas has indicated, other cases may need to be revisited. Even if none are overturned, the new decisions will not be based on a constitutional right of privacy, unless the Court reverses itself yet again.</p><p></p><p>Even Ginsburg rejected the right to privacy. She agreed with the decision in Roe, but said that it should have been decided on other grounds.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/27/what-ruth-bader-ginsburg-really-said-about-roe-v-wade/" target="_blank">What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. Wade - The Washington Post</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark46, post: 76780842, member: 257078"] ??? It is the right to privacy that SCOTUS has rejected in the latest case. As Thomas has indicated, other cases may need to be revisited. Even if none are overturned, the new decisions will not be based on a constitutional right of privacy, unless the Court reverses itself yet again. Even Ginsburg rejected the right to privacy. She agreed with the decision in Roe, but said that it should have been decided on other grounds. [URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/27/what-ruth-bader-ginsburg-really-said-about-roe-v-wade/']What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. Wade - The Washington Post[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Religion and Moral Status of the Pre-born
Top
Bottom