• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Rejected?

xapis

Soli Deo gloria!
Jul 1, 2004
2,022
254
Lambsburg, VA
Visit site
✟18,464.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Several instances in Paul's writings seem to indicate a healthy fear for being rejected (castaway, disapproved, made reprobate) by God. See 1 Cor. 9:27...

"But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."

This is the chosen apostle, Paul, expressing a personal concern of being castaway (Gr. ἀ-δόκιμος transliterated adokimos, Strong's ref. G96). This same Greek word is used surrounded by very strong language in Hebrews 6:8, among other places.

How does this piece of the soteriological puzzle fit in with the Calvinist doctrine of "Perserverance of the Saints" (i.e. Eternal Security, OSAS)? What are the eternal ramifications of such a rejection?

Thanks,
Lane
 

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
7cworldwide said:
Several instances in Paul's writings seem to indicate a healthy fear for being rejected (castaway, disapproved, made reprobate) by God. See 1 Cor. 9:27...

"But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."

This is the chosen apostle, Paul, expressing a personal concern of being castaway (Gr. ἀ-δόκιμος transliterated adokimos, Strong's ref. G96). This same Greek word is used surrounded by very strong language in Hebrews 6:8, among other places.

How does this piece of the soteriological puzzle fit in with the Calvinist doctrine of "Perserverance of the Saints" (i.e. Eternal Security, OSAS)? What are the eternal ramifications of such a rejection?

Thanks,
Lane

I don't think Paul is talking about his eternal salvation here.

"The apostle Paul describes how he is careful to be self-disciplined and to bring his body into subjection “lest possibly, after I have preached to others, I myself should be disqualified.” Does this word translated “disqualified” (NASB) suggest that Paul feared losing his salvation? Once again, as we see also in Rom. 11:22, it may be that Paul is echoing a theme found elsewhere in his letters and throughout the NT, namely, that ultimate salvation is dependent on perseverance in faith (cf. Rom. 8:13; Col. 1:23; Heb. 3:6,14; 1 Peter 1:5; 1 John 2:19), a faith which Paul believes God graciously preserves and sustains within us (see, e.g., Phil. 2:12-13).

More likely, however, is Paul’s concern that he not become slack or indifferent in his ministry lest he forfeit God’s approval on his apostolic endeavors (and perhaps the power of the Holy Spirit that energized his work). He fears not hearing God say: “Well done, good and faithful servant,” and thereby forfeiting the divine blessings and rewards he otherwise would receive (a theme he earlier addressed in 1 Cor. 3:10-15). The Greek word adokimos (translated “disqualified”) does not pertain to the test of faith but to the test of apostleship. In 2 Corinthians Paul applies the terminology of testing (adokimos and its cognates) to himself as an apostle, not as a professing Christian (see 13:6-7; cf. 1 Thess. 2:4; 2 Tim. 2:15. Gundry-Volf concludes:"

“The fact that no instance of the use of adokimos or a cognate referring to Paul relates to the test of faith or salvation, rather, that every instance has to do with his fitness as an apostle raises doubts about the view that adokimos in 1 Cor. 9:27 means rejected from salvation and suggests instead that it means rejected as an apostle” (236-37).

Dr. Sam Storms.


"And bring it into subjection; so as not to serve and obey it in the lusts thereof; but to have the ascendant of it, and government over it, that it does not, and cannot reign as it formerly did: the allusion is still to the combatant, who gets and keeps his antagonist under him, and has the command of him, and throws him on the ground, or drags him about at pleasure:

lest that by any means when I have preached to others; the Gospel of the grace of God, for their souls' profit and advantage, to gain and save them; and have called upon them so to run, that they might receive and enjoy the incorruptible crown:

I myself should be a castaway, or rejected, or disapproved of; that is, by men: the apostle's concern is, lest he should do anything that might bring a reproach on the Gospel; lest some corruption of his nature or other should break out, and thereby his ministry be justly blamed, and be brought under contempt; and so he be rejected and disapproved of by men, and become useless as a preacher: not that he feared he should become a reprobate, as the word is opposed to an elect person; or that he should be a castaway eternally, or be everlastingly damned; for he knew in whom he had believed, and was persuaded of his interest in the love of God, and that he was a chosen vessel of salvation, that could not be eternally lost: though supposing that this is his sense, and these his fears and concern, it follows not as neither that he was, so neither that he could be a lost and damned person: the fears of the saints, their godly jealousies of themselves, and pious care that they be not lost, are not at all inconsistent with the firmness of their election, their security in Christ, and the impossibility of their final and total falling away; but on the contrary are overruled, and made use of by the Spirit of God, for their final perseverance in grace and holiness."

John Gill
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
There's a clear indication Paul is talking about being cast away as a minister of Christ and not a castaway from salvation:
"But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."
His point is that he brings his body under control to validate his preaching to others and not to be cast away.

I'm not even totally certain Paul can be taken to mean he's being cast away from God in the ministry. It may mean he doesn't want to lose his reputation among his hearers. But I think 1 Cor 10 bolsters the point that Paul does these things for a different reason, for gracious praise from God: "Nor let us try the Lord, as some of them did" 1 Cor 10:9.

The effect of this approach tends to push 1 Corinthians more toward an address to the church as to why they should seek and preserve a reputation for grace, justice, and holy living. It's not to avoid eternal death and punishment. It's to keep them from harm, to give them a ministry to those who are just now hearing of Christ, and to help them see for themselves whether they're really in the faith. There is definitely a moral component to these arguments, and even a moral reward -- but there is not an immortal reward for them, people don't gain eternal life by doing.
 
Upvote 0