• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Regarding the "inhumane"...

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,812
21,694
Flatland
✟1,113,066.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
"Humane" may be partially an expression of aspiration, but it's also a recognition of fact that humans have a capacity for cruelty which animals don't have, which is to say a capacity for morality which animals don't have. At least we think they don't; I've seen a domesticated cat seemingly torment a lizard, but that's rare in nature I think, and we really don't know what's on animals minds. So it's a recognition of both aspiration and capacity, a recognition that we are different from the lower animals.
Yet as the meaning of "terrible" changed over time (and held an entirely different meaning in other cultures) the characterization of this czar likewise changed to conform with the word's meaning.

I was in a bar one time and this drunk guy was giving me this tale about how the night before he'd beat up three guys at once. I paid him a compliment and called him a liar at the same time by telling him "Wow, that's a fantastic story! You're incredible!" "Fantastic" of course in the old sense meaning "the stuff of fantasy" and "incredible" meaning "not to be believed".
 
Upvote 0

Eryk

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 29, 2005
5,113
2,377
60
Maryland
✟154,945.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Well, since when has it been "inhuman" to be cruel?
We made it this far because we had to cooperate to survive. It enabled our ancestors to hunt in groups and civilization was invented by people who built massive irrigation projects to grow food. Pro-social behaviors that reinforce trust and cohesion are known as good not because of sentiment but because of necessity. They are life.
 
Upvote 0

Dre Khipov

Active Member
Dec 12, 2015
152
40
44
USA
✟23,007.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
1) Words can mean whatever we can collectively and contextually agree these to mean. These don't have to refer to the same concepts, and these generally don't. There's plenty of confusion because people end up arguing about what they impose on any given label, and it's a pointless argument IMO. There's plenty of room for disagreement in that respect, of course it's easier to communicate when we are on the same page about meaning.

2) Not sure that we can generalize concepts like "humane", since it generally deals with surrounding culture and upbringing and not something that's "embedded" in all of us.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
I´m not sure that etymology explains the current usage of words. After all, we have those two words "human" and "humane" - both with the same etymological roots; so it´s reasonable to assume they aren´t supposed to express the same concept.
Yes; in English, the 'rules' are more honoured in their breach; hence weird situations like 'flammable' and 'inflammable'...

Wittgenstein suggested that words have no intrinsic semantics beyond how they are used; i.e. their useful semantics are a collaborative, social construct. That's why words change meaning over time and across social groups.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
In Scotland they'd say, "Did ye aye?", or - for more emphasis - "Oh, did ye aye?" (as in 'a likely story'). Sarcasm.
 
Reactions: Chesterton
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,252
✟55,667.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married

The notion of "humaneness" and "inhumaneness" is rooted in the notion that human beings are created in God's image. And so, in a sense, to be "humane" is to be what God intended humans to be - like God. Of course, Christians believe that this isn't the whole picture. Humans are both like God and unlike God because of sin. But Christians teach that sin takes away from our humanity. When we sin, when we're cruel for example, we become less human. This is also connected to the notion that to be what our creator intended for us to be is to be truly human. Jesus Christ, being sinless, was the only true human being the world has ever seen.

But if Christians are wrong then all of the above is hogwash and to be humane would include cruelty.
 
Upvote 0