• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Regarding confirmation and taking a Saint's name

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ignatius the Hermit

Saint-Aspirant
Jan 10, 2008
9,537
1,626
Green Bay, Wisconsin
✟51,353.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
As I understand it, when a Catholic is confirmed they receive a Saints name. While this is not the same as a 'legal name', I was curious how it is used.

1. Does Your Priest ever address you by it (apparently they do in the Orthodox Churches)?

2. Is it attached to you other names, or does it stand alone?

3. As an adult, do you get to choose your Patron Saint? And if so, do you assume their name then?
 

Ignatius the Hermit

Saint-Aspirant
Jan 10, 2008
9,537
1,626
Green Bay, Wisconsin
✟51,353.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Hey, I just found this thread to ask you another question brother. This one deals withthe Eucharist.

WHy is only Host given to the Church in the Eucharist and not the Blood as well? I think I read somewhere that sometmes it is, but that it isn't necessary because the Blood is also present in the Host. Is that correct?
 
Upvote 0

JoabAnias

Steward of proportionality- I Cor 13:1, 1 Tim 3:15
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2007
21,200
3,283
✟105,374.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hey, I just found this thread to ask you another question brother. This one deals withthe Eucharist.

WHy is only Host given to the Church in the Eucharist and not the Blood as well? I think I read somewhere that sometmes it is, but that it isn't necessary because the Blood is also present in the Host. Is that correct?

Most parishes offer both species these days however we believe that Jesus is fully present in either one as He cannot be divided so recieiving under either species is to recieve the complete Jesus so yes you are correct.

Peace.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Hermit

Saint-Aspirant
Jan 10, 2008
9,537
1,626
Green Bay, Wisconsin
✟51,353.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Most parishes offer both species these days however we believe that Jesus is fully present in either one as He cannot be divided so recieiving under either species is to recieve the complete Jesus so yes you are correct.

Peace.

Thanks once again brother! :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

MoNiCa4316

Totus Tuus
Jun 28, 2007
18,882
1,654
✟49,687.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Hey, I just found this thread to ask you another question brother. This one deals withthe Eucharist.

WHy is only Host given to the Church in the Eucharist and not the Blood as well? I think I read somewhere that sometmes it is, but that it isn't necessary because the Blood is also present in the Host. Is that correct?

Many churches nowadays offer both the Body and the Blood :) the church I went to on Vigil Mass did both. (I like it that way more too)

But yes, Jesus can not be divided, so if you just have the host, you still get valid Communion :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.