- Jul 1, 2013
- 9,199
- 8,424
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
Still waiting for chapter and verse from Sacred Scripture on how to deal with sex-offenders.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Still waiting for chapter and verse from Sacred Scripture on how to deal with sex-offenders.Guess you should read your bible. When a guy in my bible study group said if a person is catholic it means they have never read the bible I corrected him and told him he should not be trying to drag down God's kingdom. I hope I am not wrong.
There is a passage in Deuteronomy 22:13-29. It isn't really what one would want to see implemented today.Still waiting for chapter and verse from Sacred Scripture on how to deal with sex-offenders.
Funny.Sufficient to bear the burden that your definition of SS puts on it.
Supreme authority means just that. If there is a contradiction then the bible is the supreme authority.
.
Next time you argue with BobRyan about hell and soul sleep and similar things tell me that the bible is sufficient to prove your caseFunny.
Sola scriptura (Latin ablative, "by Scripture alone") is the Christian doctrine that the Bible is the supreme authority in all matters of doctrine and practice.
Besides "interpretation", which isn't even part of the definition, where do you think it insufficient as the authority in all matters of doctrine and practice?
You're still confused about SS and your strawman called "interpretation".Next time you argue with BobRyan about hell and soul sleep and similar things tell me that the bible is sufficient to prove your case
It isn't interpretation that is at stake it is adjudication.You're still confused about SS and your strawman called "interpretation".
Still waiting for chapter and verse from Sacred Scripture on how to deal with sex-offenders.
It isn't interpretation that is at stake it is adjudication.
There are three categories that everything falls in.
Biblical = Is in the bible and the bible supports it
Unbiblical = Is in the bible and the bible is against it
Extra-biblical = Is not in the bible and the bible is neither for it or against it.
You statement here though goes directly against what you have been arguing. You need to make up your mind as to which is correct rather than holding to a position that contains double standards. Your choice.
It doesn't say that...So then ... Mark 7:6-13 comes to mind.
Mark 7
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the Commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free.
12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother;
13 Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
You're still confused about SS and your strawman called "interpretation".
A straight answer would be a fine starting point.Are you looking for NT persecuted church model of Romans 1 and 1Corinthians 6 for that subject -- or are you looking to go back to the days of the kingdom of Israel under a Theocracy?
It doesn't say that...
So then ... Mark 7:6-13 comes to mind.
Mark 7
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the Commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free.
12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother;
13 Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
A straight answer would be a fine starting point.
We believe you're missing one. Is not explicitly in the Bible, but is supported by the Bible. Some Traditions are that. Such as the belief that Joseph was an older man when he wed Mary, who was under age, and a consecrated virgin.
Such as Mary being ever-virgin, having never conceived other children than Jesus.
Such as the doctrines of the Trinity
Still waiting.Thank you for clarifying the meaning of your question.
I'm not the one who introduced the subject of pedophiles or the proposition that there is a "biblical" way of dealing with them. When chapter and verse from Sacred Scripture was requested, the question was dodged, the subject was changed, the point was obfuscated and basically everything possible has been done to not provide chapter and verse from Sacred Scripture as to how one ought to deal with pedophiles.non-clarifications -- to vague questions - get a lot of 'waiting' time applied.
Doesn't Paul tell us to obey the law?Still waiting for chapter and verse from Sacred Scripture on how to deal with sex-offenders.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?