Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Real time or evo time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 69519396" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>I'll bite. Specify exactly how they fail to correspond.</p><p></p><p>I thought I cautioned you about using rhetoric and bombast.</p><p></p><p>I have not made known my idea of the fine structure constant. I have simply demonstrated that your statement that there was no evidence for the constancy of constants was nonsense. And that you have not addressed. </p><p></p><p>I don't cherry pick. The entire paper does the job. I'm sorry you have difficulty understanding it.</p><p></p><p>Just running with your own assumption, or did Christ not walk the land roughly 2,000 years ago?</p><p></p><p>You appear to be ignorant. Let me help you out. When asked what would falsify the theory of evolution an evolutionist, it may have been Haldane, replied "Rabbits in the Cambrian". The fact that so far we have not found fossilised rabbits in the Cambrian in now way proves evolution. However, if they ever were found there that would pretty much do it. Equally, I only need to find one piece of evidence that supports to constancy of constants to refute your statement that such evidence exists. </p><p></p><p>For your future reference I treat with equal contempt and disdain those evolutionists who claim there is no evidence for a God. </p><p></p><p>In short, I am offended by assertions by persons, such as yourself, who make absolute statements when none are justified.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 69519396, member: 234799"] I'll bite. Specify exactly how they fail to correspond. I thought I cautioned you about using rhetoric and bombast. I have not made known my idea of the fine structure constant. I have simply demonstrated that your statement that there was no evidence for the constancy of constants was nonsense. And that you have not addressed. I don't cherry pick. The entire paper does the job. I'm sorry you have difficulty understanding it. Just running with your own assumption, or did Christ not walk the land roughly 2,000 years ago? You appear to be ignorant. Let me help you out. When asked what would falsify the theory of evolution an evolutionist, it may have been Haldane, replied "Rabbits in the Cambrian". The fact that so far we have not found fossilised rabbits in the Cambrian in now way proves evolution. However, if they ever were found there that would pretty much do it. Equally, I only need to find one piece of evidence that supports to constancy of constants to refute your statement that such evidence exists. For your future reference I treat with equal contempt and disdain those evolutionists who claim there is no evidence for a God. In short, I am offended by assertions by persons, such as yourself, who make absolute statements when none are justified. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Real time or evo time?
Top
Bottom