Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Rand Paul says 'at least' 10 GOP senators are ready to vote against Trump's emergency declaration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Uber Genius" data-source="post: 73733845" data-attributes="member: 389967"><p>I certainly agree with your inference about Trumps greatest road blocks were people like Bob Corker and Jeff flake, and McCain were Trumps biggest detractors. Further the tea party who I personally love opposed his just handing the Dems everything they wanted on the first biennium budget. But Rand is a libertarian at heart. He is opposed to big government and big spending and the move in the last 50 years to an extremely powerful executive branch as opposed to a more powerful legislative branch, for those reasons he is against the executive order. We should have limited the power back in the 1970s when they first passed a bill outlining executive emergency powers.</p><p></p><p>I'm for a wall, but I'm also for requiring an civics exam and an IQ exam before allowing someone to vote. Just like we don't let children vote because of their lack of judgement. Why let someone vote just because they age? Why are we assuming that becoming a citizen (granted automatically to those born to an American citizen) should confir voting rights?</p><p></p><p>I would like people to take Paul's arguments for smaller Government and less executive power more seriously, especially after 8 years of executive abuse under Obama!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Uber Genius, post: 73733845, member: 389967"] I certainly agree with your inference about Trumps greatest road blocks were people like Bob Corker and Jeff flake, and McCain were Trumps biggest detractors. Further the tea party who I personally love opposed his just handing the Dems everything they wanted on the first biennium budget. But Rand is a libertarian at heart. He is opposed to big government and big spending and the move in the last 50 years to an extremely powerful executive branch as opposed to a more powerful legislative branch, for those reasons he is against the executive order. We should have limited the power back in the 1970s when they first passed a bill outlining executive emergency powers. I'm for a wall, but I'm also for requiring an civics exam and an IQ exam before allowing someone to vote. Just like we don't let children vote because of their lack of judgement. Why let someone vote just because they age? Why are we assuming that becoming a citizen (granted automatically to those born to an American citizen) should confir voting rights? I would like people to take Paul's arguments for smaller Government and less executive power more seriously, especially after 8 years of executive abuse under Obama! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Rand Paul says 'at least' 10 GOP senators are ready to vote against Trump's emergency declaration
Top
Bottom