Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
FalseKissing and praying to icons is something that is taught and is compulsory
Incorrect factsI'm just stating facts.
False meaning it's not taught and not expected? The Fourth Council of Constantinople : 869-870 AD indicates otherwise.False
Even though they're easy to substantiate.Incorrect facts
I have made sure. And so far I haven't criticized the tradition. I've just brought it into perspective.You know, people should make sure they know the facts before they criticize.
You have yet to show it is compusary to kiss and pray to icons. NextFalse meaning it's not taught and not expected? The Fourth Council of Constantinople : 869-870 AD indicates otherwise.
Visual witness indicates otherwise:
Even though they're easy to substantiate.
I have made sure. And so far I haven't criticized the tradition. I've just brought it into perspective.
So far you haven't said that it's not obligatory to pray to saints / icons of saints. If it's not why not come right out and say so? Because it actually is?You have yet to show it is compulsory to kiss and pray to icons. Next
I responded to your comment where you said it is compulsory to kiss and pray to icons. That statement is false. I'm not sure why it is so hard to understand.So far you haven't said that it's not obligatory to pray to saints / icons of saints. If it's not why not come right out and say so? Because it actually is?
It seems expected and required based on the Fourth Council of Constantinople and other Catholic sources I've come across. Is it not something Catholics are taught they're supposed to do?I responded to your comment where you said it is compulsory to kiss and pray to icons. That statement is false. I'm not sure why it is so hard to understand.
People do kiss icons and use them as a tool for prayer, but it IS NOT compulsory.
The Council you are referencing says venerate. Venerate does not mean kissing or praying to.It seems expected and required based on the Fourth Council of Constantinople and other Catholic sources I've come across. Is it not something Catholics are taught they're supposed to do?
It's not an instruction manual, as I said. I never said it did not contain a number of instructions, from the Ten Commandments to "Do this," which is the command of Jesus for a priest to bless and break the bread, say the words of consecration, and distribute it to the people. This is the "source and summit" of the Catholic faith. I am not familiar with that Council but I will take a look--you learn something new every day. You avoided responding to my example of the manmade tradition you use for the canon of the Bible. Essentially Protestants, a thousand years or so after the canon was established, dropped seven books from the OT but use the same order of books established by the Catholic Church--that is Protestant tradition. The 66 book Bible was not in existence for most of Christianity and that list of books should be acknowledged as manmade. Remember there was no Bible for early Christians and that the Church existed before one word of the NT was written. Jesus left many details up to the Church, as I've mentioned before Jesus never commanded His Church to compile a list of the books of the New Testament or to go out and hand out Bibles. If the Church wants to require everyone to venerate icons or everyone to fast for so many hours before communion it has every power to do so. Those kinds of practices and disciplines of reverence can be changed. Catholics and our brothers and sisters in the East take the Word of God very seriously, you will see much of the mass described in Revelation. The earliest of Christians spent some time in planning churches when first allowed freedom of worship, it was ten to twenty years when the first churches were built--it was decided to make the churches ornate on the inside. The practice of icons grew out of paintings from early Chrisitiantiy, icons developed in the East and all of these things are meant to honor God and keep our thoughts on God.Except for the fact that it's full of instructions. Most importantly for Christians, the instructions given by Christ. On how to pray for example.
You're right the Bible doesn't say anything about putting crosses on top of churches. That's a man-made tradition. Man-made tradition doesn't necessarily equate to sinning. But it should in honesty be acknowledged as being man-made tradition.
And why do you make a speech like this after using Psalm 103:20 and James 5:16 as instruction? You can't have it both ways, saying the Bible isn't and instruction manual after using it as an instruction manual.
As far as compulsory goes: All who are not disposed to venerate the icons of Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, the angels or saints are excommunicated
If anyone then does not venerate the icon of Christ, the saviour, let him not see his face when he comes in his father’s glory to be glorified and to glorify his saints’, but let him be cut off from his communion and splendour; similarly the image of Mary, his immaculate mother and mother of God, we also paint the icons of the holy angels just as divine scripture depicts them in words; we also honour and venerate those of the highly renowned apostles, prophets, martyrs and holy men as well as those of all the saints. Let those who are not so disposed be anathema from the Father, the Son and the holy Spirit. Fourth Council of Constantinople : 869-870 AD
No, Catholics today are not required to kiss any object. Once a year at Good Friday, and there is no requirement to attend any Good Friday services, the priest will invite Catholics to come up and kiss or touch a cross. That's a tradition. Or you can kneel and pray before the cross.It seems expected and required based on the Fourth Council of Constantinople and other Catholic sources I've come across. Is it not something Catholics are taught they're supposed to do?
Alright, I apologize for using the word compulsory.The Council you are referencing says venerate. Venerate does not mean kissing or praying to.
Catholics are taught that it is efficacious to kiss or use an icon as a tool for prayer, but by no means is it compulsory.
It's more of an Eastern Orthodox tradition.No, Catholics today are not required to kiss any object.
Saying "the Bible" can be misleading. The Book of Ester doesn't contain any instructions from God for example. The instructions of Jesus, regarding His several instructions on prayer, went into effect when He spoke them, not after someone wrote them down. The written instructions from Paul, John, Peter and James were in effect at the time or before they were written. And their words, especially those of Jesus, are the primary authority and foundation of the Church. Which is why the Church for the first few centuries did not add onto those instructions. Centuries after the Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers and earliest church fathers died, others started coming up with brand new material.It's not an instruction manual, as I said. I never said it did not contain a number of instructions, from the Ten Commandments to "Do this," which is the command of Jesus for a priest to bless and break the bread, say the words of consecration, and distribute it to the people. This is the "source and summit" of the Catholic faith. I am not familiar with that Council but I will take a look--you learn something new every day. You avoided responding to my example of the manmade tradition you use for the canon of the Bible. Essentially Protestants, a thousand years or so after the canon was established, dropped seven books from the OT but use the same order of books established by the Catholic Church--that is Protestant tradition. The 66 book Bible was not in existence for most of Christianity and that list of books should be acknowledged as manmade. Remember there was no Bible for early Christians and that the Church existed before one word of the NT was written. Jesus left many details up to the Church, as I've mentioned before Jesus never commanded His Church to compile a list of the books of the New Testament or to go out and hand out Bibles. If the Church wants to require everyone to venerate icons or everyone to fast for so many hours before communion it has every power to do so. Those kinds of practices and disciplines of reverence can be changed. Catholics and our brothers and sisters in the East take the Word of God very seriously, you will see much of the mass described in Revelation. The earliest of Christians spent some time in planning churches when first allowed freedom of worship, it was ten to twenty years when the first churches were built--it was decided to make the churches ornate on the inside. The practice of icons grew out of paintings from early Chrisitiantiy, icons developed in the East and all of these things are meant to honor God and keep our thoughts on God.
Indeed, instructions such as "Do this," the "breaking of the bread," the mass, was quickly implemented on Sunday in order to honor Jesus on the day of his Resurrection. Catholic refer to the Word of God that was passed down (besides Sacred Scripture) as Sacred Tradition. The "deposit of the faith," is Sacred Tradition passed down through the Apostles, and Sacred Scripture. The deposit of the faith ended with the death of the last Apostle. You are mistaken, it cannot be added to or subtracted from, but as time goes by the Catholic Church does come to a deeper understanding and God can reveal veiled truths over time.Saying "the Bible" can be misleading. The Book of Ester doesn't contain any instructions from God for example. The instructions of Jesus, regarding His several instructions on prayer, went into effect when He spoke them, not after someone wrote them down. The written instructions from Paul, John, Peter and James were in effect at the time or before they were written. And their words, especially those of Jesus, are the primary authority and foundation of the Church. Which is why the Church for the first few centuries did not add onto those instructions. Centuries after the Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers and earliest church fathers died, others started coming up with brand new material.
Such as?Centuries after the Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers and earliest church fathers died, others started coming up with brand new material.
I said it was not added to or subtracted from for centuries.Indeed, instructions such as "Do this," the "breaking of the bread," the mass, was quickly implemented on Sunday in order to honor Jesus on the day of his Resurrection. Catholic refer to the Word of God that was passed down (besides Sacred Scripture) as Sacred Tradition. The "deposit of the faith," is Sacred Tradition passed down through the Apostles, and Sacred Scripture. The deposit of the faith ended with the death of the last Apostle. You are mistaken, it cannot be added to or subtracted from, but as time goes by the Catholic Church does come to a deeper understanding and God can reveal veiled truths over time.
Once saved always saved.Such as?
My point is that arguing about canonization is irrelevant; even if we restrict the discussion to saints as the term for all Christians as used in the Bible, the doctrine of the intercession of the saints still stands. Whether you call the same man "Athanasius" or "Saint Athanasius," the debate here is not whether to give him a title, it's whether he can pray for us right now.But where in the bible do you find any distinct kind of saint referred to as "canonised"? Also, this thread was originally about the practice of praying to saints, not asking them to pray for us. To quote the original post: "But there is one aspect of praying to the saints for intercession that baffles me." (emphasis mine.)
That's a good explanation of how it works. But it begs the question why no one ever asked anything of Moses for example. Why the only person throughout all of scripture who was appealed to in prayer is God. (Psalm 103:20 is not David asking the angels for anything). I think maybe people started appealing to others in heaven for intercession because they became afraid of approaching God directly.My point is that arguing about canonization is irrelevant; even if we restrict the discussion to saints as the term for all Christians as used in the Bible, the doctrine of the intercession of the saints still stands. Whether you call the same man "Athanasius" or "Saint Athanasius," the debate here is not whether to give him a title, it's whether he can pray for us right now.
As for praying to saints versus asking them to pray for us, as @Valletta said, those are the same thing. Prayer to saints is always asking ( = praying) them to pray ( = ask God) for us, on the basis that in the book of James, the saints (using the word in its biblical sense) are told to pray for one another, and that the fervent prayer of a righteous saint accomplishes much.
Psalm 103:20 at least should contradict any argument that "the saints in heaven can't hear us or are too busy worshiping God to pay attention to us," which are arguments I've heard against the intercession of saints.That's a good explanation of how it works. But it begs the question why no one ever asked anything of Moses for example. Why the only person throughout all of scripture who was appealed to in prayer is God. (Psalm 103:20 is not David asking the angels for anything). I think maybe people started appealing to others in heaven for intercession because they became afraid of approaching God directly.
What occurs in 2 Maccabees 15 is what's described in the passage as a vision a sort of dream. I know all of the proof texts because there's only a few, and they're not very good examples of the practice being scriptural.Psalm 103:20 at least should contradict any argument that "the saints in heaven can't hear us or are too busy worshiping God to pay attention to us," which are arguments I've heard against the intercession of saints.
As for pre-Incarnation Jewish belief in the intercession of the saints, you're right that we don't have a record of someone invoking a saint's name in a prayer, but that doesn't invalidate the authenticity of the Christian practice; if it did, Christians would also not be able to be free of the Mosaic Law.
The belief that saints could intercede for the living after death wasn't new in Christianity, either, as we see in 2 Maccabees 15.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?