• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Questions for the JW's

Status
Not open for further replies.

btony

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2004
487
3
✟645.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
Seems I missed this one.. but I already addressed it in my previous post..
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
btony said:
Actually, the others are said to be AROUND the throne... Here, let us consider this matter.



A perfect example of scripture twisting. What is the context of the two verses you quoted? Other that the occurrence of one word before, is there any connection whatsoever between these two verses and Rev 7:9. In Act 4:19 and Gal 1:20 is there any mention of the presence of God, heaven, the throne, etc., as there is in the Rev passage? So the verses are absolutely meaningless in this discussion because there is no contextual relevance.



Nothing but meaningless diversion and misdirection. Let's go look at some verses where Jesus was in the temple, maybe we can twist them too. John did not say they were the temple, but that they we in the temple. Do you know the difference? John did. And I am certain had John intended to say they were the temple, to make this passage support JW doctrine, that is what he would have said. But John said they were before the throne, IN the temple of God, and in the context of the passage, they were in the same place as the myriad of angels and the 24 elders. You do understand context do you not? Did John connect all of the people and angels repeatedly with the copulative kai and all the while mean they were in two totally different places?



Talk about out-of-context verses. You have to reach all the way back to the O.T. and a different language trying to find one out-of-context verse you can use to prove your doctrine.

Your diversion to Rev 19:1 is meaningless, John saw the great multitude in 7:9, and absolutely nothing in the context indicates he as looking at two different events in two different places!
 
Upvote 0

btony

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2004
487
3
✟645.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness


Shows that "before" has nothing to do with location as you argue.



Well we've already seen that to be "before" something has nothing to do with location. And God has a temple on earth and in heaven. Being that the "come out of the tribulation" they must be alive on earth, so they must be in the throne on earth.

Actually, John quotes a LOT from the OT. But see, in Rev 19, John does not see anything, he hears! The text is ambiguous.
 
Upvote 0

G4m

Veteran
Oct 29, 2003
1,569
31
Visit site
✟1,981.00
Faith
Seeker
LogicalFallacy said:
What verse are you quoting from?
The 144,000 are no longer people when in heaven, they become spirit creatures. like all the others in heaven.
I'm not really sure i understand your question, angels will always be distinct from humans.

LF,
[bible]Matthew 19:30[/bible]
[bible]Mark 9:35[/bible]
[bible]Luke 13:30[/bible]

So in the end, wouldn't we all become spirit creatures?
 
Upvote 0

LogicalFallacy

!!!Lawns 'R' Us!!!
May 21, 2004
288
6
25
✟22,960.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
Hi G4m,
you said:
So in the end, wouldn't we all become spirit creatures?
Why? none of these verses teach that! Am I missing the point?

LF,
 
Upvote 0

G4m

Veteran
Oct 29, 2003
1,569
31
Visit site
✟1,981.00
Faith
Seeker
LogicalFallacy said:
You said; "so in the end, wouldn't wouldn't we all become spirit creatures"

LF,
OK, so the 144,000 are angels, or at least become angels?

LogicalFallacy said:
The 144,000 are no longer people when in heaven, they become spirit creatures. like all the others in heaven.
I'm not really sure i understand your question, angels will always be distinct from humans.
 
Upvote 0

Fit4Christ

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2004
1,259
30
56
Washington state
✟16,579.00
Faith
Christian
Quote:
Originally Posted by: G4m
OK, so the 144,000 are angels, or at least become angels?
LogicalFallacy said:
Well what are the created inhabitants of heaven if they are not angels?

LF,
So those 144,000 were humans who died and then became angels?? Or were already present in heaven??
 
Upvote 0

Fit4Christ

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2004
1,259
30
56
Washington state
✟16,579.00
Faith
Christian
Quote:
Originally Posted by: Fit4Christ
So those 144,000 were humans who died and then became angels??


Yes. (although they're not all in heaven yet)

OK, so how many are left? How do you know where you rank on the list? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was assuming there is some way of knowing who will and who won't be there, of those living presently I mean? Over the almost 2,000 years since this book was written, God hasn't found 144,000 saints yet?

Quote:
Or were already present in heaven??


No they came from earth - Revelation 5:9-10.

Fair enough. What about Revelation 7:5-8? These tribes no longer exist as we know it. How does a JW figure out what tribe they were from and if they'll be one of the 12,000 of that tribe?
 
Upvote 0

mawuvi

theGuide
May 12, 2004
1,185
23
London
✟1,523.00
Faith
Fit4Christ said:
That was my take on what LF was trying to say. Is that correct, LF?
I think LF is referring to the 144,000 becoming spirit creatures in heaven. Remember he mentioned earlier Matt. 5 which says the the meek would inherit the Earth. Matt 5 also talks of the pure in heart who would see God. That would mean one group (pure in heart) would see God because they are in heaven and the other group (the meek) that would not see God because they would be inherit the Earth and live in it forever
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.