Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If He was not always then He cannot be now. Eternity reaches both forward and backward. The human race will never die but it will never be immortal. It's immortality will be derived from the only immortal being in the universe.Very good post Maco.
I believe that Jesus is co-eternal NOW but wasn't always.
They can't get it because it is just an opinion. You cannot prove any of this but there is evidence to the contrary.
The only way we can get knowledge of God is through Jesus (found in His book), the experiences of His people (found in His book), and nature. This gives a very incomplete picture, somewhat purposefully ("How do we know the Father? Know me and know the Father." or something like that).
I don't expect to know these unimportant details about God until I am in heaven.
JM
Okay, if you insist.
Look at this verse:
Rev 14:11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
I don't believe for a second that "receiveth" in that verse could refer to not KNOWING we were taking it.
And notice that we also have to worship the beast.
What I always find interesting is how people talk about tattoos on our foreheads, etc. when the verses about this say it will be IN the forehead and IN the hand.
Thoughts and deeds.
Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Rev 14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
I think it's two-fold. Completely giving in and turning away from God's law to give into satan's demands or not having a "cushy" life on earth.
Accepting a counterfeit.....knowingly.
Some people really do not feel like the Sabbath commandment still stands (which would mean food and drink were nailed to the cross too), but I believe they will know the full truth before given the choice to decide between God and Satan.
Do you enjoy demonstrating what it means to be ridiculous? In a serious conversation it is out of place.Show me one verse that says Jesus has the same knowledge as the Father? Just one is all I ask.
Show where we are called to worship or love the Holy Spirit? Just one is all I ask.
Show me the throne of the Holy Spirit? It doesn't have to be like the Father and His Son's throne as long as its a throne. I'll even be happy with a little stool next to the Father for the Holy Spirit.
So, how do you think that it will occur that the Sunday sabbath will become the mark of the beast? I mean like how do you envision that happening?Okay, if you insist.
Look at this verse:
Rev 14:11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
I don't believe for a second that "receiveth" in that verse could refer to not KNOWING we were taking it.
And notice that we also have to worship the beast.
What I always find interesting is how people talk about tattoos on our foreheads, etc. when the verses about this say it will be IN the forehead and IN the hand.
Thoughts and deeds.
Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
Rev 14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
I think it's two-fold. Completely giving in and turning away from God's law to give into satan's demands or not having a "cushy" life on earth.
Accepting a counterfeit.....knowingly.
Some people really do not feel like the Sabbath commandment still stands (which would mean food and drink were nailed to the cross too), but I believe they will know the full truth before given the choice to decide between God and Satan.
So, how do you think that it will occur that the Sunday sabbath will become the mark of the beast? I mean like how do you envision that happening?
Maco, the belief in the trinity does appear to have some scriptural backing, although line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, there a little....I do not believe that Jesus is equal to the Father, so I agree with you.
To accept that Jesus IS the Father is something Adventists should have a very hard time with, because they'd have to admit that our world was without Father God for three days...which is impossible since He is and always has been immortal.
Knowing what we do about death, the trinity should make no sense to us.
That being said, I've only met one Adventist that felt Jesus was the Father.
Given the nature of American jurisprudence I don't think you will find one law on any books inthe US that mandate attendance at any church service on Sunday. If you are able to point me to one I would be very grateful.Look up "blue laws". There are already blue laws on the books that say we need to go to church on Sunday.
Maco, the belief in the trinity does appear to have some scriptural backing, although line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, there a little....I do not believe that Jesus is equal to the Father, so I agree with you.
To accept that Jesus IS the Father is something Adventists should have a very hard time with, because they'd have to admit that our world was without Father God for three days...which is impossible since He is and always has been immortal.
Knowing what we do about death, the trinity should make no sense to us.
That being said, I've only met one Adventist that felt Jesus was the Father.
Oh the "Blue Laws" exist alright, as far as I know every state has them on their books. These are the same laws that dictate whether a state allows liquor to be purchased on Sunday....which is how it is usually referenced to nowadays.Given the nature of American jurisprudence I don't think you will find one law on any books inthe US that mandate attendance at any church service on Sunday. If you are able to point me to one I would be very grateful.
The claim was that we have laws that mandate church attendance on Sunday. It is that claim that I am exploring. If you have that information you have a responsibility to provide. Otherwise you are no better than the media types you have denounced in your post. We have to correct halftruths when they surface or we are no better than those we denounce.Oh the "Blue Laws" exist alright, as far as I know every state has them on their books. These are the same laws that dictate whether a state allows liquor to be purchased on Sunday....which is usually it is referenced to nowadays.
To accept that Jesus IS the Father is something Adventists should have a very hard time with, because they'd have to admit that our world was without Father God for three days...which is impossible since He is and always has been immortal.
Do you think that it will be forced under penalty of law?Look up "blue laws". There are already blue laws on the books that say we need to go to church on Sunday. It wouldn't take much to enact those laws and start enforcing them, which would make someone like me a fugitive on the run.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?