"Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but at last was complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct."
Charles Darwin
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There is nothing to indicate Darwin was agnostic but actually that he showed more of an atheistic stance. And he definitely was not theist even though he may have been.
And still, if intelligent design does not observe that if there is no sun then there can be no days it is not called science. Do you know why evolution is taught in school and intelligent design is not? It's because evolution is and was observed, while intelligent design is based on some pseudo science as such as you have demonstrated.Science is based on observation. And thats what intelligent design is based on.
There is something to indicate Darwin was agnostic but also that he showed an atheistic stance as the arguments he had considered and advocated were atheistic. And he definitely was not theist even though he may have been.
There's actually letters from Darwin from 1879 stating he never dined the existence of a God rather he was more agnostic. He just uses the same arguments an atheist would use but still that could mean an agnostic could make the same argument of the Christian God."Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but at last was complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct."
Charles Darwin
And still, if intelligent design does not observe that if there is no sun then there can be no days it is not called science. Do you know why evolution is taught in school and intelligent design is not? It's because evolution is and was observed, while intelligent design is based on some pseudo science as such as you have demonstrated.
It is intended Historically. There is nothing to indicate it's an allegory.
There's actually letters from Darwin from 1879 stating he never dined the existence of a God rather he was more agnostic. He just uses the same arguments an atheist would use but still that could mean an agnostic could make the same argument of the Christian God.
Macroevolution has not been observed, because in this theory, it takes what? Like a million or so years?
Yes there is. There is quite a lot to indicate that it's allegorical -- especially for Christians! Surely you don't believe there is something besides the Word of God that can give life? Certainly not a literal mystical tree?
It has been observed. Speciation often takes millions of years in longer lived species, but it can happen very quickly in species with short generations.
Meaning he lost faith jack ass. I should be asking you the same question.
Tell me were in the bible it indicates that it's an allegory.
In the very passage! As I say, God clearly points out that it is the Tree of Life by which Man can live forever. But Jesus says that he is the Life and it is his flesh and blood that must be consumed for Life. And again in Revelation, the leaves of the Tree of Life are said to heal the nations. Do you believe that it is not the Word, but a literal tree that does this?
What species?
And my response to your other post.
Tell me were in the bible it indicates that it's an allegory.
We would not expect to see large changes directly, as evolution deals with small changes over large periods of time. So if we observed something like a fish growing into a frog in just a couple generations or even less, that would be evidence against evolution. Also, macroevolution is just the term biologists use to describe evolution at or above the species level, and speciation has been observed.Macroevolution has not been observed, because in this theory, it takes what? Like a million or so years?
Now you are sounding even more like a jack ass. Keep it up.Call me a JACK ASS because I see your addiction is clouding your mind. Your mother must be so proud of you. Still please explain how he can be an atheistic theist I'd really like to know how that goes down. I don't believe I ever called you names but if I ever did I apologize. I did in my earlier years affiliate with the party of the Democrats so I won't take offense.
The tree of life is the garden of eden right? Well it probably got destroyed by the flood.
A new type of mosquito would be microevolution, not macroevolution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?