Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Question about evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GraftMeIn" data-source="post: 258815" data-attributes="member: 2683"><p>Sure I understand the difference between rocks and reacting chemicals. I can toss two rocks into a toilet, they will clog it up. I can mix two reacting chemicals in a toilet and they will make it explode. Neither one is going to cause a form of life to emerge. unless there's an angry alligator in the sewer, that I just annoyed. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>You do know the difference between the Bible and other religions don't you? </p><p></p><p></p><p>After reading the entire Bible, and reading about archeological finds that back up the contents of the Bible, and looking into what the other gods of other religions are, what they represent,&nbsp;and how they came into being recognized as gods. I can clearly see that the Bible is not just made up. Not to mention the fact that I have felt Gods touch, I can feel his spirit in me, and I have heard his voice, I see him working in my life, I know without a doubt he is real. I cannot and will not ever deny him. </p><p></p><p> </p><p>It has to do with the fact that you want me to compare God with a bunch false Gods that are nothing more than evil spirits trying to take his place. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>where is all this so called evidence to support other claims? and why are you asking me the same question twice? I already explained why. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>debate isn't simply telling someone else they don't have a clue what they're talking about, and that's what you are telling me. without even considering what I have said, because you don't think I should use the bible as a source of what I'm saying. </p><p></p><p>If you don't think I should use the Bible as a source, then maybe you shouldn't use science as your source of backing up your claims. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>The Bible doesn't say that the earth sits in one spot and never moves.&nbsp;It could be possible that God created these set them in place, and then they began to revovle, and why doesn't it make sense to create the planet before the sun? Why does the sun need to come first? </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I already answered this see above, this is the third time in the same post you asked me this question. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>And is it so wrong for me to say that plants need light and water in order to grow on the earth? How is that in conflict with science? </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Maybe that's because it makes no sense that no life plus no life equals life. and if science is all about evidence then where is the evidence for it? </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I never asked you to disprove anything, Your the one who seems to want to disprove it. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>How do you know for sure that's the age of the sun, and that our dating methods are correct? I don't even rely on the dates that have been derived from the Bible, I have no idea how long the first day lasted, or how long Adam could have been in the garden, or if he even aged while he was in the garden. The Bible doesn't give us clear and specific dates on that stuff. </p><p></p><p>It could be possible that the days have been growing shorter since the time the world was formed, The bible states that towards the end the days would be shortened, or else we would never survive. this itself could explain why the&nbsp;standards of time differ according to the Bible and science. </p><p></p><p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GraftMeIn, post: 258815, member: 2683"] Sure I understand the difference between rocks and reacting chemicals. I can toss two rocks into a toilet, they will clog it up. I can mix two reacting chemicals in a toilet and they will make it explode. Neither one is going to cause a form of life to emerge. unless there's an angry alligator in the sewer, that I just annoyed. You do know the difference between the Bible and other religions don't you? After reading the entire Bible, and reading about archeological finds that back up the contents of the Bible, and looking into what the other gods of other religions are, what they represent, and how they came into being recognized as gods. I can clearly see that the Bible is not just made up. Not to mention the fact that I have felt Gods touch, I can feel his spirit in me, and I have heard his voice, I see him working in my life, I know without a doubt he is real. I cannot and will not ever deny him. It has to do with the fact that you want me to compare God with a bunch false Gods that are nothing more than evil spirits trying to take his place. where is all this so called evidence to support other claims? and why are you asking me the same question twice? I already explained why. debate isn't simply telling someone else they don't have a clue what they're talking about, and that's what you are telling me. without even considering what I have said, because you don't think I should use the bible as a source of what I'm saying. If you don't think I should use the Bible as a source, then maybe you shouldn't use science as your source of backing up your claims. The Bible doesn't say that the earth sits in one spot and never moves. It could be possible that God created these set them in place, and then they began to revovle, and why doesn't it make sense to create the planet before the sun? Why does the sun need to come first? I already answered this see above, this is the third time in the same post you asked me this question. And is it so wrong for me to say that plants need light and water in order to grow on the earth? How is that in conflict with science? Maybe that's because it makes no sense that no life plus no life equals life. and if science is all about evidence then where is the evidence for it? I never asked you to disprove anything, Your the one who seems to want to disprove it. How do you know for sure that's the age of the sun, and that our dating methods are correct? I don't even rely on the dates that have been derived from the Bible, I have no idea how long the first day lasted, or how long Adam could have been in the garden, or if he even aged while he was in the garden. The Bible doesn't give us clear and specific dates on that stuff. It could be possible that the days have been growing shorter since the time the world was formed, The bible states that towards the end the days would be shortened, or else we would never survive. this itself could explain why the standards of time differ according to the Bible and science. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Question about evolution
Top
Bottom