Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Question about evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shai-Hulud" data-source="post: 258394" data-attributes="member: 3259"><p>You do understand the difference between rocks and reacting chemicals do you? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You rejected all other creation myths for the biblical one. I'm assuming that you have a reason to do so. I want to know that reason.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What does that have to do with anything? EXPLAIN THIS.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because the answer presented there does not make sense. Because the answer there doesn't explain anything. Because it's obviously wrong. Because there is plenty of evidence to accept the other explainations. Now I want you to explain why you accept creationism. Why do you reject all other creation myths&nbsp;but not&nbsp;yours.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have no idea how a debate works do you?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would one bother to create a second source of light? And how much sense does it make to create the planet before the sun it orbits. Of course you can explain that away with an omnipotent being, but it simply isn't logical or efficient.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because I want to know why you reject them, and not the bible. You must therefore have found something in the bible that isn't in any other creation myth, or have found errors in all other myths.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm an engineer, and amateur scientist. And yes it is possible to interpret the bible so that it doesn't confilict with science. But never the literal interpretation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that's been explained to you about three times. You have never offered any questions or remarks about that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Is that all? What do you want me to disprove? Just the literal interpretation of genesis, or a little of everything?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No it wasn't. It was no more unlikely than your mythology. People just stopped believing in it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Quite probably for the fifth or sixth time.<strong><em><u> The sun has existed for about a billion years longer than life on this planet. </u></em></strong>You state exactly the opposite.</p><p></p><p>Shai-Hulud</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shai-Hulud, post: 258394, member: 3259"] You do understand the difference between rocks and reacting chemicals do you? You rejected all other creation myths for the biblical one. I'm assuming that you have a reason to do so. I want to know that reason. What does that have to do with anything? EXPLAIN THIS. Because the answer presented there does not make sense. Because the answer there doesn't explain anything. Because it's obviously wrong. Because there is plenty of evidence to accept the other explainations. Now I want you to explain why you accept creationism. Why do you reject all other creation myths but not yours. You have no idea how a debate works do you? Why would one bother to create a second source of light? And how much sense does it make to create the planet before the sun it orbits. Of course you can explain that away with an omnipotent being, but it simply isn't logical or efficient. Because I want to know why you reject them, and not the bible. You must therefore have found something in the bible that isn't in any other creation myth, or have found errors in all other myths. I'm an engineer, and amateur scientist. And yes it is possible to interpret the bible so that it doesn't confilict with science. But never the literal interpretation. And that's been explained to you about three times. You have never offered any questions or remarks about that. Is that all? What do you want me to disprove? Just the literal interpretation of genesis, or a little of everything? No it wasn't. It was no more unlikely than your mythology. People just stopped believing in it. Quite probably for the fifth or sixth time.[B][I][U] The sun has existed for about a billion years longer than life on this planet. [/U][/I][/B]You state exactly the opposite. Shai-Hulud [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Question about evolution
Top
Bottom